AI Rate Professor

English

Eileen Smith

ENGL10B · ENGL1A · ENG1A · ENG10AENG25 · FREN2 · ENGL · ENGLISH1A · ENGL25 · ENGLISH10B · ENLISH1A · ENGENG · ENGLISH · S2101 · ENGL10A · ENG10B · FREN0001 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

A solid English choice if and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear InstructionsGood FeedbackFair GraderReading HeavyOpen-Book Friendly
  • Students , and strong with feedback.
  • You work for the A through reading, discussions, and essays, but the path is transparent.
  • personality complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Students say complete the readings and assignments and you can earn A or .

Online reviews more often claim easy A; in-person says fair if you work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

regular reading, discussions, and a .

; linguistics and some lit sections feel harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

and others optional or not grade-based.

Mixed signals online and in person; no single policy is proven for all courses.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

, and many call her a favorite English instructor.

Stronger modern online and recent in-person praise; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Repeatedly called fair with clear criteria and .

Format shift

Online and in-person both stress fairness; a few older in-person reviews disagree.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Regular discussion posts, reading, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online often notes lots of posts; .

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

, and structure, while a smaller group finds her abrupt or unclear.

Format shift

; in-person includes more older critical voices.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of discussion posts, quizzes, essays, and focus.

Format shift

Online often open-book tests plus essays; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person and hybrid-labeled reviews mostly praise fairness and structure, with a minority finding her fast, soft-spoken, or unhelpful.

Main concern

A minority report unclear lectures or weak support for non-English majors.

What students said

“There is .”
ENGL1A
“She's only hard if ”
ENGL1A
“ , and very knowledgeable about all her subjects!”
ENGL1A

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students , and doable grades when reading and posts are completed.

Main concern

Schedule clarity can confuse some; discussion volume and .

What students said

“Shes a and !!”
ENGL1A
“easily passed with an A, being a senior in high school.”
ENGL1A
“The but they were open book so if you read they were pretty easy.”
ENGL10B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and papers more than strict proctored exams.

Open Book TestsDiscussion PostsResearch PaperClear Rubrics

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments describe quizzes, discussions, and research papers; .

Research PaperReading QuizzesMandatory DiscussionsNo Final Sometimes
“There is .”
ENGL1A
“There are and .”
ENGL1A

Online

Online students report open-book tests .

Open BookReading QuizzesEssaysDiscussion Posts
“The but they were open book so if you read they were pretty easy.”
ENGL10B
“As long as .”
ENGL1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Shes a and !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews (6 online, 23 in and structured English work. Credibility rating: High.

📝

72/100

“She is very fair, grade is based on structure and not opinion.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

90/100

“ .”

📚 Reading and Workload

52/100

“She does require a lot of reading, so be ready to read.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and very knowledgeable

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • As long as .
  • She makes you work for an A.
  • Pretty easy class.

Theme 3

⚠️

  • Her weakest quality is clarity, she tends to follow this schedule thing she made up.
  • She was passive agressive, unhelpful, and unclear.
  • the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-nine reviews over many years show a and in-person detail to trust the overall picture.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 57
3 out of 56
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGL1A6 reviews
ENGL10A3 reviews
ENGL10B3 reviews
ENGLISH1A3 reviews
ENG10B2 reviews
Show 11 more courses
FREN22 reviews
ENG10AENG251 review
ENG1A1 review
ENGENG1 review
ENGL1 review
ENGL251 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH10B1 review
ENLISH1A1 review
FREN00011 review
S21011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values