AI Rate Professor

Economics

Meghan Dresselhaus

AGAB53 · S1879 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Prefer her online section if available; if you need predictable tests and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderClear grading criteriaGives good feedbackRespectedMixed by format
  • and can lead to harsh grade outcomes.
  • Online students praise her teaching and feedback but .
  • Personality is liked; recommendation and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

One student earned a C- with and , so an A is not low-effort.

; online review does not report grade outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-to-high with write-in testing and .

In-person rated harder (4) than online (3).

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Attendance was not mandatory in the in-person review but .

; in-person reported optional.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Exactly half of and a hard no for in-person testing.

; in-person student would not.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and fail risk over similar wording on papers.

Format shift

; online tags say clear criteria and .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

, and tests without describing overwhelming daily volume.

Format shift

; neither details extreme load.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Students like her as a person and online teaching quality, but and communication undercut learning.

Format shift

Online quality 4; in-person quality 1.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Write-in tests and review quizzes .

Format shift

; online also uses homework plus standard class structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Nice personality but , and poorly announced write-in tests that can tank grades over minor wording matches.

Main concern

Write-in tests and plagiarism-style fail risk when wording overlaps with classmates.

What students said

“She gives you review quizzes that DONT help . They are all write in questions and most the time she does not post when the .”
AGAB53

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Students call her a good, respected teacher with clear criteria and , but .

Main concern

workflow.

What students said

“She is a very good teacher. But if you have the online class she uses gmail to turn in homework and it is not as good as canvas.”
S1879

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and poorly aligned with review quizzes, with weak posting of test dates.

Write-in testsReview quizzes misaligned with examsUnclear test dates on Canvas

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and test dates often are not posted on Canvas.

Write-in questionsUnhelpful review quizzesLate or missing Canvas test notices
“They are all write in questions and most the time she does not post when the .”
AGAB53

Online

Online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Shes a but if your options dont match or some words are the same on a paper as another class mate she will fail you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in person), highlighting format split in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality Split

48/100

“She is a very good teacher. But if you have the online class she uses gmail to turn in homework and it is not as good as canvas.”

⚖️

30/100

“if your options dont match or some words are the same on a paper as another class mate she will fail you.”

👍 Recommendation 50/50

50/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a very good teacher.
  • Shes a

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • test
  • she will fail you

Theme 3

💻 About Online Logistics

  • she uses gmail to turn in homework and it is not as good as canvas
  • use the Shasta college platform canvas like it is intended to be used

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two older 2019 reviews, one per format, with mixed signals and limited grade detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AGAB531 review
S18791 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values