Lorelle Lindquist

ART61 · ART61A · ART6 · ART60A · AHIST344 · ART2 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 34/100
RMP rating: 2.7/5
Take again: 0%
Difficulty: 2.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can self-teach art history, stay awake through monotone lectures, and tolerate a polarizing personality.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMonotone lecturesTalks down to studentsEasy if you stay awakeScatter-brainedPolarizing

Older reviews split between warm mentors and mean, snooty, or scatter-brained instructors
Art history often easy content-wise but boring lectures make staying awake hard
Recent online review is a one-word political complaint with no course-process detail

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Multiple students call content easy if you attend and , but grades and fairness details are sparse.

Mostly older in-person evidence; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Difficulty averages low and several students say history art is easy if you stay awake and study.

Mostly older in-person evidence; online review rates difficulty 1 with no substance.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

; one defender implies bad grades come from not attending.

; in-person comments rarely specify policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Would-take-again is 0% where reported, and many students say .

Online is a ; in-person opinions are mixed but lean negative overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Little concrete grade data; one supporter says bad .

Format shift

In-person comments dominate; .

Workload

Light

68/100

Content is often described as easy; main burden is memorization and staying awake, not heavy projects.

Format shift

and art-history reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Some call her outstanding and nice, but more report monotone delivery, talking down, or scatter-brained teaching.

Format shift

In-person reviews are mixed; the single online review is strongly negative and non-specific.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Quizzes and memorization of artists/paintings are mentioned; .

Format shift

and memorization.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person studio and art history experiences range from outstanding and , and dreaded.

Main concern

, and memorization-heavy history content.

What students said

“She lectures and then expects you to memorize all the names of all the paintings and artists. Not a good teacher.”
ART6

“I beleive she is a great teacher and doesn't get the respect she deserves.”
ART61A

“She and made a class that, under a different teacher I would have enjoyed, something I dreaded going to every day. AVOID!”
ART61

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online review is a one-word quality complaint with no useful course-structure detail.

Main concern

No constructive course information; only a hostile one-word comment.

What students said

“Liberal Activist”
AHIST344

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and memorization of artists and paintings, but .

QuizzesMemorize artists and paintings

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments mention quizzes and heavy memorization of paintings and .

QuizzesMemorize artists and paintings

“She lectures and then expects you to memorize all the names of all the paintings and artists.”
ART6

“Just go to class and study for quizzes.”
ART6

Online

Online .

“Liberal Activist”
AHIST344

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“She and made a class that, under a different teacher I would have enjoyed, something I dreaded going to every day. AVOID!”
Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews (1 online, 8 in-person), highlighting polarizing personality, monotone lectures, and relatively easy content. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“She and made a class that, under a different teacher I would have enjoyed, something I dreaded going to every day. AVOID!”

😴 Lecture Energy

30/100

“she has a really low monotone voice and its practically impossible to stay awayke in her class”

❤️ Polarizing Personality

40/100

“She is one of the nicest people I have ever met, and if anyone say anything bad about her it is probably because they got a bad grade for not attending class.”

📚 Course Ease

70/100

“her history art classes are easy if you can stay awake and don't talk to her”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

really low monotone voice and its practically impossible to stay awayke
she is a bit monotone, so its hard to stay awake

Theme 2

💔 About Personality

She talks down to everyone. Very much. To the extreme
one of the nicest people I have ever met

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

history art classes are easy if you can stay awake
memorize all the names of all the paintings and artists
Just go to class and study for quizzes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews span 2006-2019, but many are short, old, and mixed, with only one sparse online comment.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52

4 out of 51

3 out of 52

2 out of 51

1 out of 53

Course coverage

AHIST3442 reviews

ART62 reviews

ART612 reviews

ART21 review

ART60A1 review

Show 1 more courses

ART61A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values