AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Larry Bettes

ENGRENGR · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Take his Engineering courses if you want a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyGreat Engineering MentorClear Grading CriteriaGood FeedbackParticipation MattersHelpful Intro Courses
  • Students rate him excellent for engineering courses at Shasta College
  • He gives useful insight and
  • Comments are sparse and somewhat old, so

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Reviews praise him but do not claim free As; difficulty ratings range from easy to moderate.

All evidence is in-person; no grade or easy-A language is stated.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Difficulty ratings are low to moderate and comments frame his courses as .

Only in-person reviews; one rates difficulty 1 and one rates 3.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

as not provided.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Both quality scores are 5 and the detailed review strongly urges taking his Engineering 2 course.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and good feedback without calling him harsh or overly easy.

Format shift

and feedback.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Reviews ; workload is not a major complaint.

Format shift

No format contrast; in-person comments stay high-level.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students call him a great engineering professor and a good overall teacher with helpful insight.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments mention participation and feedback but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person engineering students call him a great and .

Main concern

Very limited comment detail and one review is from 2009.

What students said

“He is a great Engineering professor, he gives a bit of insight into what I consider a starving major in shasta college.”
ENGRENGR
“Good overall teacher.”
ENGRENGR

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, or .

Clear grading criteriaParticipation mattersGood feedback

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews and participation.

Clear grading criteriaParticipation matters
“He is a great Engineering professor, he gives a bit of insight into what I consider a starving major in shasta college.”
ENGRENGR

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is a great Engineering professor, he gives a bit of insight into what I consider a starving major in shasta college.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 sparse in-person reviews focused on engineering mentoring. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He is a great Engineering professor, he gives a bit of insight into what I consider a starving major in shasta college.”

👍 Strong Recommendation

90/100

“Take his Engineering 2 course, it really helps.”

📝

70/100

“Good overall teacher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a great Engineering professor
  • Good overall teacher.
  • he gives a bit of insight into what I consider a starving major in shasta college.

Theme 2

📈 About Courses

  • Take his Engineering 2 course, it really helps.
  • Participation

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only two brief in-person reviews spanning 2009-2018 with almost no grade or .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGRENGR2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values