AI Rate Professor

English

Colleen Harvel

ENGL1B · ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENGLISH1A · ENG1B · ENGLISH190 · ENGLI1A · ENGLISH · ENGLU7804 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can handle heavy writing, strict deadlines, and frequent vegan tangents; online looks especially risky.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy essay loadVegan digressionsStrict deadlinesMixed approachabilityHard grader
  • English 1A/1B with and .
  • some learn a lot from her standards, others call her unhelpful or deadline-chaotic.
  • Online sections drew , and last-minute projects.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Some call her an while others say she is a essays.

Online student still reported an A but complained about process; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

, and high expectations make the content intellectually and time intensive.

Both formats describe heavy work; online especially notes too much work in little time.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

class.

Attendance comments come mainly from in-person reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

and many urge students to pick someone else.

Both online reviews said no to taking her again; in-person opinion is split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Tags and comments range from easy grader to hard grader who docks full letter grades for missing essay length.

Format shift

Harshness appears in both formats; online also reported ungraded work.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Frequent quick writes, lots of reading responses, and 4 to 10 essays depending on section.

Format shift

; online emphasizes dense short-window workload.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some students praise helpfulness and writing prep while others report rudeness, no help, and .

Format shift

In-person is mixed-positive; online quality is clearly weaker.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and reading responses rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

; online focuses on essays and a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students describe a knowledgeable but polarizing English teacher with lots of , and frequent vegan talk.

Main concern

, and sudden due-date changes frustrate many.

What students said

“ , but I had to do 2-3 quick writes a week, and write 4 large papers.”
ENG1A
“she is a and not very approachable. She changes due dates and .”
ENG1A
“Awful teacher... She will spontaneously change due dates to screw with students.”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews report weak connection, little feedback, slow grading, and heavy last-minute work with .

Main concern

, and a huge final project assigned near semester end.

What students said

“There was hardly no connect with her whatsoever. . She also .”
ENG1B
“You have a short amount of time to do a lot of work, and the most ...”
ENGL1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly papers and weekly writing rather than proctored exams.

Few or no testsEssay-focusedQuick writesFinal project online

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students report little to no testing and heavy paper loads instead.

No tests for some sectionsQuick writesLong essays
“ , but I had to do 2-3 quick writes a week, and write 4 large papers.”
ENG1A

Online

Online comments emphasize essays and a .

Essay-focusedFinal project
“By the time the semester had a week left, she assigned a .”
ENG1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There was hardly no connect with her whatsoever. . She also .”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, contrasting heavy essay workload with polarized teaching views. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“Colleen tries to be a mean teacher, but she isn't. and goes out of her way as much as possible.”

👎 Recommendation Split

34/100

“Please listen to this suggestion and it.”

📚 Heavy Writing Load

28/100

“if you take her for English 1A beware of the , as in 8 to 10 is required.”

⚖️

38/100

“she is a and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She often got off on bunny trails about her vegan-ism
  • Very Knowledgable English Teacher
  • Her Vegan views get really annoying!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It's really difficult, and very very mentally challenging with little room for error
  • She is a and funny
  • Lots of readings, so plan on responding to them with great detail

Theme 3

⚠️ About Deadlines & Support

  • kept changing due dates around
  • does not allow assignments to be turned in early or late
  • Didn't seem to want to help me when I aproched her for help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

28 reviews with and mixed but recurring themes on essays, vegan talk, and .

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 510
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1A14 reviews
ENGL1A7 reviews
ENG1B1 review
ENGL1B1 review
ENGLI1A1 review
Show 4 more courses
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH1901 review
ENGLISH1A1 review
ENGLU78041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1