AI Rate Professor

Communication

Claudia Mosby

CMST54 · SMALLGROUPS · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid Claudia Mosby for communications if .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerRude to studentsTough graderBusy workUnclear instructionsMandatory attendance
  • Students overwhelmingly describe her as rude, condescending, and disrespectful in class.
  • Harsh grading and busy work.
  • ; nearly every review tells students to pick anyone else.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students say solid effort often yields a B and an A requires dedicating your life to the class.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Heavy lectures, weekly quizzes, papers, presentations, and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Tags and and you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Would-take-again is 0% and reviews consistently call her the .

Recommendation is .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

; students report harsh presentation grades and C averages despite strong speeches.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of , and large presentations.

Format shift

Workload complaints are exclusively in-person.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students , and learning almost nothing.

Format shift

Every review is in-person and strongly negative on teaching climate.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and high-stakes presentations.

Format shift

Assessment pattern is described only for in-person CMST.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person CMST students report rude treatment, harsh grading, busy work, group projects, and .

Main concern

Disrespectful classroom climate and and papers.

What students said

“Most disrespectful teacher I've ever had.”
CMST54
“Singlehandedly the .”
CMST54
“Do yourself a favor and !!!!”
CMST54

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Frequent quizzes and harshly graded presentations create a high-pressure assessment style.

Weekly quizzesTough presentation gradingLecture-heavyBusy work papers

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person , and very tough presentation grading.

Weekly quizzesTough presentation gradingBusy work
“ and then lectures heavy on it after we already took the .”
CMST54
“SO much busy work, along with huge presentations, gives 2 bogus tests a week out of the book.”
CMST54

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Singlehandedly the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 in-person reviews with highly consistent negative themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“All around terrible professor. Doesn't teach you anything and is very rude.”

👎

5/100

“Do yourself a favor and if .”

⚖️

14/100

“grades extremely harshly (Solid effort is worth a B, you will have to devote your life to this class to get an A)”

😤 Classroom Climate

10/100

“She loves putting people on blast, especially when they have a bad presentation.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Most disrespectful teacher I've ever had
  • constantly has a condescending attitudetone
  • She didn't teach anything

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Too much useless busy work
  • The

Theme 3

⚠️ About Clarity & Fairness

  • Personally gave me lower grades although my assignment rubrics or mistakes were the same as others
  • Doesn't follow syllabus

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

16 highly consistent negative reviews with detailed examples of rudeness and .

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 511

Course coverage

CMST5415 reviews
SMALLGROUPS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values