AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Zeth Campe

PHIL6 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Strong online pick if , and fair flexibility while still doing the work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardVery InvolvedFlexible DeadlinesGives FeedbackProvides Own MaterialsLearning-Focused
  • Students call him awesome for staying involved and .
  • and videos instead of relying only on a textbook.
  • Deadline flexibility exists if you are responsible, not if you flake.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

He prioritizes learning and will flex deadlines for responsible students, making a strong grade more attainable without free rides for flakes.

All evidence comes from one online review; no in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Difficulty sits around average, with and support that lower the intellectual barrier.

All evidence comes from one online review; no in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

82/100

Online format plus deadline flexibility for .

All evidence comes from one online review; no in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

The only review is strongly positive, calling him awesome for , and support.

All evidence comes from one online review; no in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

He would rather help you succeed with feedback and deadline flexibility than watch you fail over a missed assignment.

Format shift

All evidence comes from one online review.

Workload

Light

68/100

Workload appears manageable with instructor-provided materials and flexible due dates for responsible students.

Format shift

All evidence comes from one online review.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Described as awesome, highly involved, and focused on actual learning with personal materials and feedback.

Format shift

All evidence comes from one online review.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention assignments and feedback but .

Format shift

All evidence comes from one online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students praise , and flexible deadlines for serious students.

Main concern

Flexibility disappears if you miss work carelessly.

What students said

“Professor Campe was awesome. He and provides his own reading materialvideos.”
PHIL6

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The single online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Campe was awesome. He and provides his own reading materialvideos.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 online review, highlighting involvement, materials, and flexible deadlines. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“Professor Campe was awesome. He and provides his own reading materialvideos.”

⏱️ Deadline Flexibility

82/100

“His goal is that you learn and does give flexibility on deadlines (if you are not a flake) rather than see you fail because you missed an assignment.”

👍 Recommendation

92/100

“Professor Campe was awesome.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He and provides his own reading materialvideos.
  • His goal is that you learn.

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • does give flexibility on deadlines (if you are not a flake)
  • rather than see you fail because you missed an assignment.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one older online review; highly detailed but too small a sample for strong confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL61 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values