AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Ereka Bishop

FSS25 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid her online section; only consider in person if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing OnlineTextbook DependentTest Wording IssuesNot Tech SavvyEdition Mismatch
  • In-person students find her overall good if they study the textbook carefully.
  • Online students strongly warn against her class due to confusion, edition errors, and weak presence.
  • Quizzes and a solid grade is still possible.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A- is possible, but quizzes are hard and , so .

Online reports harder quizzes; in person emphasizes textbook study and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Difficulty ratings and and hard quizzes.

Online is described as harder and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Online students say , while .

Online evidence is strongly negative; in-person evidence is mixed-to-fair.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

She fixed test mistakes and adjusted grades, but and .

Format shift

In person notes grade adjustments; -.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Textbook study, homework references, and .

Format shift

Online workload and hard quizzes.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

In person is okay with PowerPoint and activities, but and poorly supported.

Format shift

In person rated average-good; online rated very poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Tests and quizzes are repeatedly mentioned as key challenges for grades.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize quizzes or .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person lectures use PowerPoint with activities; success depends on textbook study, and though she adjusts mistakes.

Main concern

No office hours and .

What students said

“Studying the textbook is the key to success in this class.”
FSS25
“ .”
FSS25

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report confusion, , and a professor who is not tech savvy or present enough online.

Main concern

, and weak online support.

What students said

“Do not take her class online. .”
FSS25
“Not tech savy for having an online class&not present online.”
FSS25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and wording issues that the professor later fixes.

Confusing Test WordingHard Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, though she corrected mistakes and adjusted grades.

Confusing Test WordingGrade Adjustments
“ . There were a few mistakes on her tests but she fixed them and adjusted our grades accordingly.”
FSS25

Online

Online students report hard quizzes and .

Hard QuizzesInaccurate Homework References
“ is not accurate.”
FSS25

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do not take her class online. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews across online and and textbook dependence. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Online Experience Risk

20/100

“Do not take her class online. .”

📚 Textbook Is Essential

55/100

“Studying the textbook is the key to success in this class.”

🧪

42/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures primarily with , but breaks it up with class activities.
  • Doesn't hold office hours.
  • Not tech savy for having an online class&not present online.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • A-

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • .
  • Said we have the 13th edition in the book, but everything she puts up is from the 12th edition
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Two detailed 2014 reviews across formats show consistent concerns about confusion, but the sample is small and older.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

FSS252 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values