AI Rate Professor

Science

Mike Grifantini

AGNR10 · AGNR50 · AGNR61 · AGNR52 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

and environmental science if you respect the instructor and want real field learning.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerField TripsRespect-FocusedWell OrganizedEnvironmental ScienceFair Tests
  • , and interesting field work.
  • You work for the grade but learn from a knowledgeable, respectful instructor.
  • A minority call him unprofessional, outdated, or overloaded on content.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Assignments and tests are fair and , but you still work for the grade.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

58/100

Content is interesting and often manageable, though some courses cover a lot of material.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

; field trips and lab participation clearly matter.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Five of seven reviews strongly praise him as excellent, helpful, and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Students describe fair assignments and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload is reasonable for science labs, though some sections pack a lot of material.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and helpful outside class; a few cite poor professionalism.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Field labs, assignments, discussions, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and high respect expectations with mostly strong teaching.

Main concern

Occasional organization or professionalism complaints and dense material coverage.

What students said

“Excellent instructor. day.”
AGNR52
“ . Pretty easy and very interesting even for someone who hates the sound of "environmental science."”
AGNR61
“First,the man has no curriculum, and takes you out in the .”
AGNR50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe fair tests and assignments without extreme proctoring details.

Fair TestsField LabsAssignments

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and regular assignments.

Fair TestsField Labs
“Assignments and . Interesting topics for discussion.”
AGNR52

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Excellent instructor. day. You will work for your grade, but you will learn the subject matter from someone who knows how to teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting organization, field work, and mixed professionalism notes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“EXCELLENT TEACHER. He expects respect and will not let you get away with anything less. .”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“ !”

⚠️ Organization Risk

30/100

“the man has no curriculum, and takes you out in the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very helpful and really tries to get students thinking
  • covers a lot of material but makes it interesting

Theme 2

🌿 About Field Learning

  • I loved his class and the field trips.
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • his lack of professionalism is profound
  • goes over way to much material ..instead of

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Seven older reviews (2010-2013) are detailed but the sample is small and slightly polarized.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AGNR102 reviews
AGNR522 reviews
AGNR612 reviews
AGNR501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values