AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Micheal Grossman

SOC1 · SOC · ANTH14 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Likely a solid, supportive sociology/anthropology option, but thin written feedback means you should not expect detailed course intel.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpful FeedbackSupportive ProfessorLight DifficultySparse CommentsInformational Course
  • Average quality is solid (4.0) with mostly mid-to-high ratings.
  • Only and support for success.
  • Most reviews lack written comments, so depth of insight is limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Low reported difficulty and supportive feedback suggest grades are attainable with reasonable effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Average difficulty is low (2.2) and the detailed review found the course informational rather than brutal.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

75/100

Ratings are mostly 4-5 and the detailed review recommends the course for everyone.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Low difficulty ratings and praise for .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

70/100

Difficulty averages low and comments .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

75/100

The detailed review calls him a great professor with ; other ratings are mid-to-high without detail.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Sparse in-person ratings lean positive; the and support.

Main concern

Almost no .

What students said

“he is a great professor he gives you great feed back to help you succeed.”
ANTH14

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

proctoring.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he is a great professor he gives you great feed back to help you succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews (mostly non-comment), highlighting limited but . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯

75/100

“he is a great professor he gives you great feed back to help you succeed.”

👍 Course Recommend

75/100

“ ”

📚 Informational Content

72/100

“I found this course to be very informational as well as educational.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • great feed back to help you succeed
  • very informational as well as educational
  • with the help the Glen he helped us all through this course

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I thought it was going to be a very hard course
  • he helped us all through this course

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only 5 reviews and just one with real comments; older data and no grade distribution limit confidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SOC2 reviews
SOC12 reviews
ANTH141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values