AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

John Murray

MATH102 · MATH101 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Skip if ; only consider if you learn well independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRushes TopicsPoor ExplanationsMixed ReviewsNot Personal
  • Two MATH102 reviews slam rushed coverage and weak help when students are stuck.
  • One early review calls him knowledgeable and enjoyable as a new teacher.
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

High difficulty ratings and .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students say he moves on too fast and leaves gaps when people still do not understand.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Strong never-recommend language outweighs one milder positive early review.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

; complaints center .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload volume is not a main theme; pace and clarity are the .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

, and a never-recommend review dominate.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math students mostly report rushed lessons and weak follow-up help, with one milder early review.

Main concern

Does not spend enough time on topics and .

What students said

“ .”
MATH102
“He didn't spend enough time on any given subject, then expected you to just understand.”
MATH102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Overall teacher rating "D".”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews spanning 2011-2012. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“He try's to help but just makes things worse.”

👎 Recommendation

28/100

“ .”

📚 Pace & Clarity

32/100

“He didn't spend enough time on any given subject, then expected you to just understand.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • didn't spend enough time on any given subject
  • just shrug his shoulders and move on
  • Very knowledgable. Enjoyed his class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Support

  • try's to help but just makes things worse
  • doesn't ask the class if we understand anything

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Three reviews from 2011-2012 with mixed but mostly negative teaching themes and decent detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1022 reviews
MATH1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values