AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Charles Ford

MATH240 · MATH101 · MATHMATH · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if and stay on top of weekly quizzes; expect a brisk, uneven lecture style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGrumpy but helpfulFast-paced lecturesWeekly quizzesFlexible drops and attendance bonusHard to take notes
  • Solid math instructor once you adjust to a grumpy, fast style.
  • ; drops and .
  • Lectures can confuse or go off-topic; many learn more from book or lab.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Drops and , but and hard pace mean an A still takes steady work.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Students call him fast-paced and among the harder math instructors, especially MATH240.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

72/100

Perfect attendance can add up to 6% and schedule flexibility .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

and support despite communication flaws.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Drops and attendance bonus cushion grades, but .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

as overwhelming.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Helpful and ; .

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

; book study is important.

Format shift

Based on in-person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

helpful and , but lectures are fast, off-topic, or for some.

Main concern

Pace and and keeping up difficult.

What students said

“He's a great teacher, once you get used to his grumpy old man personally.”
MATH240
“Talks to the board, covers material and keep up.”
MATH240
“You can get up to 6% added to your grade for , and he .”
MATH101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard math quizzes and and ; no special proctoring details.

Weekly quizzesTest dropsPrompt test return

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

weekly quizzes and and prompt return; .

Weekly quizzesSeveral test dropsPrompt grading
“ but that actually kept me focus.”
MATH240
“he .”
MATH101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's a great teacher, once you get used to his grumpy old man personally. but that actually kept me focus.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person , and mixed lecture clarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“Great teacher. Very helpful. I really liked his promptness in .”

⚡ Pace & Clarity

35/100

“Talks to the board, covers material and keep up.”

👍 Flexibility

72/100

“You can get up to 6% added to your grade for , and he .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • grumpy old man personally
  • causes confusion easily

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Pace

  • fast pace,you may need to slow him down
  • hardest teacher
  • Learn more from textbook and math lab

Theme 3

📝 About Assessment

  • quizzes weekly
  • I always knew where I stood in the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reasonably detailed in-person reviews from 2008-2010 show a consistent mixed-but-usable pattern.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH2405 reviews
MATH1012 reviews
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values