AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Cherry McAbe

POLS2 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a and rewards steady effort with an easy path to an A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCares about studentsInteresting lecturesEasy A with effortNot politics-requiredBest-in-class vibe
  • Students rate her among the .
  • Politics becomes fun and interesting even for non-fans.
  • Getting an A is quite easy if you put in the work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students say she makes getting an A quite easy if you put in the work, not a free ride with zero effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Difficulty ratings are mid-low and non-politics students still found the class fun and interesting rather than brutal.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Both reviews give perfect quality scores and call her one of the .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students say an A is quite easy if you put in the .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Light

72/100

; focus is on interesting lectures and manageable effort for an A.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students call her one of the , and able to make politics fun.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews , so assessment balance is unclear.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person POLS2 students call her one of the lectures and caring support that makes an A attainable with work.

Main concern

Only two older reviews, so expectations about workload and .

What students said

“By far one of the . Im not a fan of politics yet I found this class both fun and interesting.”
POLS2
“Very cool teacher, very interesting lectures even if you are not into the subject.”
POLS2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far one of the . Im not a fan of politics yet I found this class both fun and interesting. She cares about her students and really makes getting an A quite easy if you put in the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching quality and grade accessibility. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Teaching Quality

95/100

“By far one of the .”

🎯 Easy A With Effort

82/100

“She cares about her students and really makes getting an A quite easy if you put in the work.”

📚 Subject Engagement

90/100

“Very cool teacher, very interesting lectures even if you are not into the subject.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • By far one of the .
  • Very cool teacher, very interesting lectures even if you are not into the subject.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She cares about her students and really makes getting an A quite easy if you put in the work.
  • Im not a fan of politics yet I found this class both fun and interesting.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only two detailed five-star reviews from 2008-2010 with consistent praise but limited sample size and no grade or .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

POLS22 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values