AI Rate Professor

English

Candce Byrne

ENGL1A · ENG190 · ENGLISH1B · ENG1B · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Solid pick for English if you want a and can handle a fair amount of work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful and student-focusedMakes English funDetailed feedbackLot of workHighly recommended
  • Students find her helpful, detailed, and focused on success.
  • She makes English fun and is described as a cool person.
  • Workload can be heavy, with some mixed quality ratings.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

, but comments mention a lot of work rather than a free A.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Difficulty ratings range mid-level and one student notes lots of work without calling content impossible.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

One explicit highly recommended plus strong help-focused praise, tempered by a 3/5 review and blank comments.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

No strong easy-A or ; success talk centers on help and detail.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

At least one student flags a lot of work, while others do not complain about volume.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Students call her very helpful, detailed, fun, and cool, with mostly 4-5 quality scores.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English students mostly praise her help, detail, and fun style, with occasional notes about heavy work and mid-tier ratings.

Main concern

Some call out lots of work and one lower quality score; two reviews have no comments.

What students said

“ . Detailed but concerned with the students success.”
ENGL1A
“Very cool person. She really tries to help people. She isn't boring, makes English fun. Highly reccomended.”
ENGLISH1B
“good, lot of work tho”
ENGL1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very cool person. She really tries to help people. She isn't boring, makes English fun. Highly reccomended.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting help-focused teaching and moderate workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Teaching Quality

80/100

“ . Detailed but concerned with the students success.”

👍 Recommendation

76/100

“Highly reccomended.”

📚 Workload Reality

42/100

“good, lot of work tho”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • . Detailed but concerned with the students success.
  • She isn't boring, makes English fun.
  • Very cool person. She really tries to help people.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Workload

  • good, lot of work tho
  • Highly reccomended.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews from 2005-2010 with mostly positive tone, but two have no comments and sample detail is uneven.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL1A2 reviews
ENG1901 review
ENG1B1 review
ENGLISH1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values