AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Savannah Houston

ENGR17 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take if you expect a real engineering workload and can live with imperfect delivery and limited graded items.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHard engineering courseFew graded itemsMinor exam curvesDoable homeworkProject issues
  • Only one review for ENGR17 describes a hard course that is still doable with time.
  • Grade leaned on a few projects and .
  • Teaching delivery was average; student earned an A but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Student earned an A with and , but the course still takes real time.

All evidence is from one In person ENGR17 review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Student calls it a hard engineering course that needs significant time.

All evidence is from one In person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

.

All evidence is from one In person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

; course is doable but delivery and .

All evidence is from one In person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and an A reported; not described as harsh or ultra-generous.

Format shift

All evidence is from one In person review.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, but the course is hard and .

Format shift

All evidence is from one In person review.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Delivery was not perfect, yet the class stayed workable for a motivated student.

Format shift

All evidence is from one In person review.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Grade mixes a , and .

Format shift

All evidence is from one In person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ENGR17 is a hard but workable engineering class with and .

Main concern

and can dominate the grade with few other items.

What students said

“The well and I think there was only 2 projects that turned into a significant part of our grade.”
ENGR17
“Hard course ofc, so expect . Delivery wasn't perfect, but it was doable, especially with .”
ENGR17

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams exist and ; no open-book or strict proctoring details given.

Minor exam curvesIn-person exams

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; reviews do not prove proctoring software or open-book policy.

Minor exam curvesIn-person exams
“Delivery wasn't perfect, but it was doable, especially with .”
ENGR17

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hard course ofc, so expect . Delivery wasn't perfect, but it was doable, especially with .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 In person review. Credibility rating: Low.

🛠️ Course Difficulty

35/100

“Hard course ofc, so expect .”

📊 Assessment Shape

52/100

“I think there was only 2 projects that turned into a significant part of our grade.”

🎯 Teaching Delivery

50/100

“Delivery wasn't perfect, but it was doable, especially with .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Hard course ofc, so expect .
  • and doable.
  • especially with .

Theme 2

🧪

  • The well.
  • only 2 projects that turned into a significant part of our grade.
  • Graded by few things

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one recent In person review; limited sample and no strong consistency check possible.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR171 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values