AI Rate Professor

English

Danielle Kerr

ENG1600 · ENGL1000 · ENGLISH1600 · ENGL1500 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
25.93%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless you specifically want an intense writing bootcamp and can handle heavy weekly work with .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy workloadLots of papersUnclear feedbackAI accusations
  • Polarizing English professor with many 1-star reviews and only about 26% would-take-again.
  • Heavy weekly writing load, strict late policies, and .
  • A minority who want rigorous writing practice and put in .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even , and heavy effort for mid-range grades rather than free As.

and frustration; some in-person and older sections still earned B or A with major effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content itself is standard English, but volume of , and time demand make the course feel hard.

Both formats describe high time cost; online often feels more overwhelming and poorly supported.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and students say skipping hurts; late work is often refused.

In-person is frequently mandatory; online still enforces hard deadlines and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most recent students urge others to stay , and communication issues, despite a vocal minority of fans.

Online ; in-person is split with older praise and newer complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; students cite picky deductions, AI accusations, and .

Format shift

; a few students call her fair if you follow directions exactly.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Reviews repeatedly mention 4-8 weekly , and no-late-work policies that crush schedules.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are especially intense; and holiday work.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

and discussions, while many cite , outdated content, and low empathy.

Format shift

Recent online reviews are much more .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Course centers , and some tests or quizzes rather than a .

Format shift

Both formats are paper-heavy; online also mentions Proctorio or invasive proctoring for tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but still often negative on workload and ; some older reviews praise discussions and learning if you work hard.

Main concern

, and reports of public drop or low empathy.

What students said

“ONLY professor that didn't work with me. Dropped me from class & didn't tell me till I showed up in person”
ENGLISH1600
“Unapproachable and dismissive. .”
ENGL1500
“I would 100% recommend her.”
ENG1600

Remote format

Online

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

huge weekly assignments, tough grading, poor feedback, AI accusations, outdated materials, and .

Main concern

Overwhelming , and low empathy for life emergencies.

What students said

“STAY AWAY.”
ENGL1500
“Uses INVASIVE proctor for .”
ENGL1500
“ ”
ENGLISH1600

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment risk is ; overall not student-friendly for busy schedules.

ProctorioInvasive ProctoringTest HeavyMany Papers

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and heavy writing than detailed proctoring tools; grading remains strict.

Many EssaysPop QuizzesStrict Deadlines
“ and ”
ENGL1500
“Lots of writing assignmentsessays. She is somewhat picky on writing”
ENG1600

Online

and constant high-volume writing with no late work.

Invasive ProctoringProctorioLots of HomeworkNo Late Work
“Uses INVASIVE proctor for .”
ENGL1500
“the .”
ENGL1500

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“STAY FAR AWAY”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Workload Shock

18/100

“This professor overdoes a 3 credit class! She assigns 4-8 assignments a !”

📉 Recommendation Reality

28/100

“ .”

⚖️

22/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and concise if you have any questions shes happy to help
  • Stunningly low effort for prof. The class has not been updated since April 2021

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • HUGE work load, its hard to keep up
  • as small as a single page number in the wrong font
  • Not an easy A class

Theme 3

⚠️ About Red Flags

  • accused me of AI
  • Stay away from this professor, she gives you trauma that will stay with you for your whole life
  • No late work allowed

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-nine reviews over many years with strong recent negative clustering, detailed complaints, and mixed older praise provide a reliable picture.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 52
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 516

Course coverage

ENGL150014 reviews
ENG160013 reviews
ENGLISH16006 reviews
15003 reviews
ENGL10002 reviews
Show 1 more courses
9051 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 3 · A- 2

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

5

C+ 3 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

10

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 7 · Not sure yet 2