AI Rate Professor

Education

Michelle Beasley

1590ECE · ECEF1531 · ECEFS1531 · ECEF150120 · ECEF1611 · ECEF1500 · 1601ECE · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
82.35%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can, show up, do the projects and textbook work, and she is a strong ECE pick.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring & big-heartedClear grading criteriaGroup projects heavyStrict on syllabusIn-person friendlier
  • Most students call her caring, hilarious, and willing to help (even with textbook costs).
  • Do the and rubrics, and grades stay fair; and she will not soft-bail you.
  • and condensed; in-person is strongly preferred.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Follow the syllabus, complete projects and reading, and most students land A or A+; no free A without the work and little .

Online students stress modules and thorough reading for A/B; in-person students , and finishing group work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

, but projects, textbook reading, and participation add real structure rather than pure fluff.

Online is often described as condensed and tougher; in-person feels more supported and lower stress.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and skipping can tank the grade or participation score.

; online is mixed with some participation-heavy formats.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Strong majority would take her again for her care, humor, and toughness or weak online teaching.

Recommendation is strongest for in-person; online praise is still high but more conditional on self-discipline.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and usually relaxed once you hit the specs, though some call her a tough grader with little .

Format shift

Online comments emphasize sticking to the rubric; in-person comments range from very fair to tough.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect , and regular assignments rather than a featherlight load.

Format shift

Online condensed terms stack more work; and participation.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students praise caring lectures, humor, and support, with a minority saying online instruction is thin or unclear.

Format shift

In-person teaching reputation is excellent; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

, and textbook-based assignments more than classic exams.

Format shift

Both formats center projects and modules; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person she is widely loved as caring, funny, and and if you participate and complete work.

Main concern

Attendance and participation often count, and a .

What students said

“Shes so amazing and so caring. When I couldn't afford textbooks, she helped me.”
ECEF1500
“You will pass the class with an A+ if you do all your work! Also the .”
ECEFS1531

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online is organized around syllabus and modules with , but several students say there is little , and a condensed pace that adds work.

Main concern

and no or weekend grace.

What students said

“Im taking online classes and there is no real instruction. .”
ECEF1531
“If you follow the syllabus/modules, read & do assignments you can easily get an A/B.”
ECEF150120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly projects and assignment rubrics; time rather than high-stakes closed-book stress.

Group testsMulti-day test windowsProject-heavy assessmentClear rubrics

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and grading that rewards completed work more than pure exam grind.

Group testsEssay assignmentsGroup projects
“Also the and she usually gives you 2 days to do it.”
ECEFS1531
“She gives work out and does alot of ”
ECEFS1531

Online

Online reviews do not clearly describe proctored exams; success is framed around modules, reading, and long-term projects.

Module-based assignmentsLong-term projectsNo extra credit
“Watch out for ! No , no weekend grace period.”
ECEF1531
“The .”
ECEF150120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Beasley has such a big heart, she is so kind and truly cares about her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews (4 online, 16 in person), highlighting care, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Caring Presence

88/100

“Shes so amazing and so caring. When I couldn't afford textbooks, she helped me.”

📋

80/100

“If you follow the syllabus/modules, read & do assignments you can easily get an A/B.”

🏫 Format Matters

70/100

“ a bit tougher.”

⚠️ Minority Red Flags

25/100

“ ! She is one of the worst professors at Taft College”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing professor. and helpful.
  • She cares about your education and she wants you to pass her class.
  • She'es honestly the !!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you read the material and do the work, you will succeed in this class.
  • You will pass the class with an A+ if you do all your work!
  • at times she wants it very specific

Theme 3

💻 About Online vs In Person

  • Her online courses are a little more difficult bc they are condensed which =more work
  • There is no real instruction. .
  • a bit tougher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews spanning 2012-2026 with consistent themes on care, projects, and and .

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECEFS15317 reviews
ECEF15314 reviews
ECEF1501203 reviews
ECEF15002 reviews
ECEF16112 reviews
Show 2 more courses
1590ECE1 review
1601ECE1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 8 · A 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 2