AI Rate Professor

Information Science

Sukena Taibjee

INCO1040 · INCO104843ST · INCO1048 · LIB100 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
15.38%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless required; expect , and difficult interactions.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderOverwhelming workload for 1 unitRude communicationUnclear feedbackAvoid if optional
  • Most students describe heavy work for a one-unit class and .
  • snarky replies and feeling dismissed.
  • A few older notes of flexibility exist, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students still earn As, but , and MLA nitpicks make an A costly.

; online adds snarky communication complaints.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content is not always hard, but overload of papers and .

In-person and online both emphasize volume of tasks more than abstract difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

yes, without a single clear policy.

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Most students say ; .

Negative recommendation dominates online and in-person; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

; rubrics ignored and MLA format marks students down hard.

Format shift

; online also cites resubmit demands.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

Repeated claims of 1-unit work loaded like a 3-unit class with many papers.

Format shift

Workload complaints are strong online and in person.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students cite rudeness, unclear answers, and as core failures.

Format shift

Online has more communication horror stories; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Papers, homework, and .

Format shift

Online mentions tests and papers; and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews mostly call the class overloaded and poorly explained, with one older positive note of flexibility.

Main concern

Too much work for credit hours and .

What students said

“First of all, his class is only for one credit, and he makes it look like three.”
LIB100
“Simply put, you have a better chance of watching Stephen Hawking walk than passing her class.”
INCO1048

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students report , and tough grading on papers.

Main concern

and hostile or .

What students said

“She's awful to work with. Incredibly rude and has some sort of god complex.”
INCO1048
“Very rude! Told me I was "wasting her time".”
LIB100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is paper- and test-heavy with strict format enforcement; reviews .

Test heavyMany papersAnnotated bibliography finalStrict MLA

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and rubrics that are not followed; exam software is not clearly proven.

So many papersTough graderRubric not followed
“This teacher will give you a rubric, and not even .”
INCO1040
“He gives you too many tasks and .”
LIB100

Online

Online reviews emphasize papers, homework, and a ; proctoring tools are not clearly proven.

Annotated bibliography finalStrict MLALots of homeworkTest heavy tags
“The ; Which wasn't hard but when the professor specifically asked you to do it a certain way and then marks you down because it's not in proper MLA 8 format.”
INCO1048
“This is a single unit class, and she assigns work as if it is a 3 unit class.”
INCO1048

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews with and poor communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“He is the . .”

👎 Recommendation

15/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Overload

16/100

“This is a single unit class, and she assigns work as if it is a 3 unit class.”

💬 Communication Issues

20/100

“Very rude! Told me I was "wasting her time".”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and confuses you more
  • does a terrible job at explaining anything

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • does not grade objectively and
  • marks you down because it's not in proper MLA 8 format

Theme 3

💔 About Character

  • Incredibly rude and has some sort of god complex
  • super rude
  • has had a couple moments of being rude

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across 2017-2024 with highly consistent , and demeanor.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 510

Course coverage

INCO10486 reviews
LIB1005 reviews
INCO10401 review
INCO104843ST1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1