AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Sonja Swenson

ARTH1500 · ART · HUM2010 · HUMANITIES5 · ARTB1A · HUM1500 · ART1A · ARTAPP · ART1500 · HUM1510 · ARTH · HIST1520 · HUMFILM · ARTHIST · HUM5 · ARTH1 · ART1 · FILM · HUMANITIES · HUM10 · ART1B · HUM · ARTAPR · ARTHISTORY · FILMSTUDIES · ART2 · 51 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Only take her if you can self-manage textbook reading and ; avoid if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing PersonalityTextbook Word-for-Word TestsEasy Content Heavy ReadingUnclear Online DirectionsHit-or-Miss Tech Support
  • Course content is generally easy if you read her book because .
  • and helpful while online students report tech failures and cold responses.
  • Take-again rate sits near 40 percent with strongly split 5-star and 1-star reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many students say easy A or dead easy if you read the book and ; text.

and ; in-person reviews also report light work and fair grades when you stay on her good side.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

, and museum or film reviews rather than abstract hard theory.

Both formats describe easy material; online adds field-trip or museum paper requirements.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

Some in-person sections mark attendance mandatory while .

Online ; in-person comments more often list attendance as yes.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Roughly 40 percent would take again and and .

Positive in-person caring reviews contrast with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Often fair when work is complete, but some report harsh zeros for portal issues or unfair quiz marking.

Format shift

Online complaints about zeroed finals and wrong auto-grades .

Workload

Light

70/100

, and one or two papers plus a short final.

Format shift

Both formats call workload small if you keep up; online .

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Students either praise inspirational caring feedback or call her rude, unhelpful, and tech-unready.

Format shift

; recent online reviews are more negative on support.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and short research or review papers.

Format shift

Online leans quiz-plus-paper; and museum work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

light weekly work to rude unhelpful grader who gets mad when students ask questions.

Main concern

some students find her cold, stubborn, or unfair on grades.

What students said

“Prof Swenson is so awesome... Youll do great just ask for help if you need .”
HUM1500
“Small amounts of work, maybe 3 things at most a week. Loved it.”
ARTH1500
“She is the rudest professor at Taft College that I have met.DO NOT ASK HER QUESTIONS!”
ART1

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections hinge on her textbook quizzes and papers; many call it easy if you outline chapters, but others report , and slow or .

Main concern

Submission portal errors and .

What students said

“ but could not turn it in through the portal she provided... She considered it my problem & gave me a 0.”
ARTH1500
“Stay away from this class if possible. Text book is written by her, all the book.”
HUM1500
“You'd honestly have to be stupid not to get an A, it's dead easy - the easiest teacher on campus.”
ARTH

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; friendliness depends on open-book reading prep rather than open-note policy.

Word-for-word textbook questionsTimed exams onlineQuizzes before examsMuseum or field-trip paper

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments mention timed exams, quizzes before exams, and occasional hard or .

Timed examsPre-exam quizzesMuseum visit requiredMixed test clarity
“There were 4 timed exams & u had to take quizzes (1-10 quizzes, 5 .”
ARTH1500
“ . I would read the chapter over and over and the .”
HUM

Online

and pulled from the book; students recommend chapter outlines with page numbers.

Textbook word-for-word testsChapter outline strategyGrace period for late workPortal submit risk
“ the book. Pay attention and you will be fine.”
HUM1500
“All of the . Most testsquizzes were not timed.”
ARTH1500

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You'd honestly have to be stupid not to get an A, it's dead easy - the easiest teacher on campus.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (12 online, 38 in person), highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“She is the rudest professor at Taft College that I have met.DO NOT ASK HER QUESTIONS!”

📘

78/100

“ the book. Pay attention and you will be fine.”

💻 Online Tech Risk

35/100

“ but could not turn it in through the portal she provided... She considered it my problem & gave me a 0.”

❤️

75/100

“Prof Swenson is so awesome... . Good luck !! :)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof Swenson is so awesome, I enjoyed the course
  • She was a very nice teacher to have

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you keep up on the
  • You'd honestly have to be stupid not to get an A
  • sounds hard but it really isn't
  • Easy A/B but and read carefully

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • all the book
  • I suspect she isn't very tech savvy
  • She considered it my problem & gave me a 0
  • Easy class but

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

51

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning many years with detailed mixed themes give solid coverage, though format quality differs and older short comments dilute consistency.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 53
3 out of 56
2 out of 59
1 out of 513

Course coverage

HUM15008 reviews
ART4 reviews
ARTH15004 reviews
ART1A3 reviews
ARTHISTORY3 reviews
Show 21 more courses
HUM53 reviews
ART22 reviews
ARTB1A2 reviews
ARTHIST2 reviews
HUM102 reviews
HUMANITIES2 reviews
ART11 review
ART15001 review
ART1B1 review
ARTAPP1 review
ARTAPR1 review
ARTH1 review
ARTH11 review
FILM1 review
FILMSTUDIES1 review
HIST15201 review
HUM1 review
HUM15101 review
HUM20101 review
HUMANITIES51 review
HUMFILM1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 2 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1