AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Michael Highers

MATH · MATH57 · NANAN · FINITEMATH · BIO · MATH50 · MATH52 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

Take Michael Highers if you need a clear math explainer and can handle a direct classroom personality.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear Math ExplanationsBeginner FriendlyPolarizing PersonalityGreat for Returning StudentsMakes Math Click
  • Most students praise clear, detailed explanations that finally make math understandable.
  • Difficulty is generally low for those who connect with his style.
  • A minority call him harsh or demeaning, so personality fit matters.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Many rate difficulty at 1 and report .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Math content becomes approachable for .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Majority strongly recommend him for math clarity, tempered by a .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Low difficulty ratings and success stories suggest fair, reachable grades for engaged students.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

72/100

Reviews emphasize understanding .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Six perfect quality scores for negative reviews.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews focus on lecture .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Most in-person students love how clearly he breaks down math, while a few report demeaning comments and .

Main concern

A minority experience him as harsh or condescending in class.

What students said

“ and a way that dosen't confuse you.”
MATH57
“He can explain a math technique in a way that you can understand.”
MATH50
“What a jerk! . He never explanies anything.”
MATH

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and proctoring are not clearly described in student comments.

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the . First time that I actually did good in math. and a way that dosen't confuse you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews, balancing strong clarity praise with minority harshness reports. Credibility rating: High.

🧮

85/100

“He can explain a math technique in a way that you can understand.”

👍 Recommendation Split

74/100

“Awesome teacher!! Wish I could take more math classes from him!”

⚠️ Personality Risk

25/100

“What a jerk! . He never explanies anything.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mr. Highers can teach!
  • and a way that dosen't confuse you
  • put the math problem into terms that you can understand

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • never dream I could get a "B" in math
  • First time that I actually did good in math
  • i got a 100.3%

Theme 3

⚠️ About Character

  • What a jerk!
  • he puts you down in front of the class
  • . HIGHERS

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews with detailed positive and negative quotes create a consistent majority pattern despite some age.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH522 reviews
MATH572 reviews
BIO1 review
FINITEMATH1 review
MATH1 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH501 review
NANAN1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values