AI Rate Professor

Business

Brian Quarles

BADM109 · BADM117 · BADM118 · BADM100 · BDM118 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
93.33%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if , and can self-manage online.

Best fit · Self Taught ProParticipation heavyPowerPoint-driven examsClear feedbackMinimal homeworkSelf-study online risk
  • Strong overall recommendation with and .
  • In person is engaging but cold-calls; online is easy if self-driven yet one review flags poor messaging response.
  • Grades favor participation and a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Many As with and , but missed tests or weak participation can still yield C grades.

Online stresses near-impossible-to-fail if self-study; in person ties grades tightly to participation and not missing tests.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is standard intro business; and participation expectations, not advanced theory.

Both formats call it manageable if you read PowerPoints and quizzes.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Most in-person and several online reviews mark attendance or participation mandatory and cold-calling is common.

In person clearly participation-mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

About 93% would take again and most call him a .

; online is mostly positive with one severe outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

and straightforward quizzes, but little flexibility on late work or .

Format shift

Online has a clear no-lenience complaint; in and tests.

Workload

Light

78/100

; weekly quizzes/discussions and a couple of .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize few graded items and reading PowerPoints.

Teaching experience

Good

86/100

Students love interactive lectures and and occasional unresponsiveness online.

Format shift

In-person teaching charisma is stronger; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and participation, with .

Format shift

; in person grades participation plus tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Fun, sarcastic lectures with random cold-calls, group activities, and .

Main concern

and speak in class; forgetting an .

What students said

“He calls on people randomly and expects you to have read the slideshow before it is taught in class.”
BADM117
“His lectures and powerpoints give all the , so if .”
BADM100
“If !”
BADM109

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and PowerPoint-based quizzes; but one harsh note on unresponsive help.

Main concern

and zero leniency if .

What students said

“His class is easy (he just copy and and final) but he will not answer back any messages or questions.”
BADM100
“His assignments are very straightforward and understandable. .”
BADM117
“It's nearly impossible to fail, but definitely impossible to learn if and/or textbook.”
BADM100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes track lectures and slides closely; online midterms and .

PowerPoint-based examsMultiple choice and T/F quizzesCopied midterm/final onlineParticipation grading

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and PowerPoints; grading leans on participation and a few tests.

Lecture-based testsParticipation pointsOptional weekly quizzes
“His lectures and powerpoints give all the ”
BADM100
“ ”
BADM109

Online

and as the same copied test; quizzes and discussions are straightforward if you study PowerPoints.

Copied midterm and finalPowerPoint quizzesDiscussions
“he just copy and and final”
BADM100
“studying the quizzes”
BADM100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I will try to take this professor for every class possible.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, balancing strong lecture praise with and support caveats. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“An amazing professor. Took two classes with him and wish I could take all of my BADM classes with him!”

📚

78/100

“It's nearly impossible to fail, but definitely impossible to learn if and/or textbook.”

🗣️ Participation Pressure

70/100

“He does call on people so you need to make an effort to talk (its a grade).”

⚠️ Support Gap Online

40/100

“he will not answer back any messages or questions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • amazing lectures
  • kind and funny and makes the class feel as a family
  • very sarcastic and really makes you think

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • impossible to fail
  • I forgot about a test, and i ate a C

Theme 3

📋 About Structure

  • and guidelines in the syllabus
  • Just follow the rubric and participate

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

15 reviews across years with mostly consistent themes, but mixed online support quality and some missing grades lower certainty.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BADM1006 reviews
BADM1174 reviews
BADM1182 reviews
BDM1182 reviews
BADM1091 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values