AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Juliana Yankey

MATH105 · MATH4249382 · MATH12 · MATH42 · MATH4259113 · MATH10 · MATH50 · MATH104 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless you are strong in math and and mismatched exams.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understand accentTough graderTest heavyFalls behind syllabusSelf-teach required
  • Recent reviews are largely negative on clarity, pacing, and .
  • Tests and ; many students report self-teaching and weak support-class help.
  • A minority of older reviews praise humor and help for motivated students who keep up.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Tough grading and test-heavy weights mean an A .

Both online and ; nearly all grade evidence is from in-person classes.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Many students call the pace , and report falling behind material before finals.

Difficulty complaints are concentrated in recent in-person math105 and MATH104 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and tags warn that skipping class means you will not pass.

; online comments rarely discuss it.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Only about a , and recent comments explicitly tell struggling math students to stay away.

Recommendation is weak across formats; the few positive .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

and frequent C/D/drop outcomes show strict test-driven grading with limited safety nets.

Format shift

Strict grading reports .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of homework, MyLab costs, pop quizzes, and lower-level math course.

Format shift

Workload complaints appear in both formats but are detailed mainly for .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Students split on humor and kindness, but , and force self-teaching.

Format shift

Online sample is tiny and negative; the bulk of and mixed-to-poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests, pop quizzes, and .

Format shift

richer detail in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Most in-person students report mandatory attendance, test-heavy grading, lectures that lag the syllabus, and material that .

Main concern

Pacing, accent clarity, and it risky for students who struggle with math.

What students said

“Her accent is . Canvas shows a different grade than what she gives you.”
math105
“lectures don't match homework, homework barely matches the study guides and .”
MATH104
“The , and it caused my garde to be really bad. I had to self- teach.”
math105

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as , and hard to understand, with no interest in retaking.

Main concern

Accent and students.

What students said

“Ms Yankey is a tough teacher, she spends half her time in class lecturing you on how bad you're doing and will laugh at questions.”
MATH12
“Her accent is very hard to understand. You don't need to the book, you need the code to access the Connectmath though.”
MATH50

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and pop quizzes are high-stakes, often closed-calculator, and frequently .

Test heavyPop quizzesNo calculators oftenStudy guides mismatch exams

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes that decide the grade, with and bans on calculators.

Test heavyPop quizzesNo calculatorsStudy guides do not match exams
“The , and it caused my garde to be really bad.”
math105
“ . Goodluck!”
MATH104
“She doesn't allow calculators, doesn't like phones or food, gives quite a bit of homework”
MATH4259113

Online

and pop quizzes but do not clearly describe proctoring tools.

Tests are toughPop quizzes
“ ”
MATH12
“ . Passed all of them.”
MATH50

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have a hard time with .”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews (2 online, 24 in person), highlighting clarity, testing, and recommendation themes. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Clarity

32/100

“DOES NOT TEACH MATH”

🧪

34/100

“The , and it caused my garde to be really bad.”

🚫 Low Recommendation

25/100

“ .”

📘 Syllabus Drift

30/100

“Always behind and doesnt follow the syllabus.”

Theme 1

🗣️ About Communication

  • Her accent is .
  • Sometimes it is difficult to understand her due to her heavy accent.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The
  • If you do all the homework you should
  • Test 3 and 4 are the hardest

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I had to self- teach
  • She is funny and made the class fun but not a good teacher overall

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

26 reviews spanning many years with detailed recent comments give a consistent, cautionary picture despite some older praise.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 56
2 out of 53
1 out of 59

Course coverage

math1055 reviews
MATH125 reviews
MATH1044 reviews
MATH503 reviews
MATH102 reviews
Show 6 more courses
MATH42493822 reviews
02215486101 review
491381 review
493821 review
MATH421 review
MATH42591131 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 3