AI Rate Professor

English

Elisa Urmston

ENGL50 · ENGLISH50 · ENG45 · ENGLISH1A · ENGLISH643084 · EGL50 · ENGL104 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENG6ENG50 · ENG50 · ENG1C · 62 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
91.89%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take her if you want a if you like music themes.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyMusic-themed essaysAmazing feedbackInspirationalWorkshop draftsMLA coach
  • Builds real writing skill with multiple draft reviews and
  • Music and Beatles themes make English engaging for most students
  • Easy A if you write the papers and use her revision opportunities

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students say if you draft, revise, and try you almost always land an A or high B.

Evidence is mostly in-person; the few online grades also skew high with revision chances.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Writing volume is real but scaffolds and music .

In-person dominant; .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Many sections expect presence for workshops and credit, .

; online sample is too small to generalize.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Nearly all reviewers call her the because she builds writers.

Overwhelmingly in-person praise; online is mixed but still mostly positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

Multiple draft reviews and .

Format shift

In-person evidence is strong; .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Several essays and workshops create steady .

Format shift

Both formats are paper-heavy; in-person adds group workshops.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students , and transformative for writers.

Format shift

Excellence is mainly documented in person; online has one theme mismatch complaint.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and revisions more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

In-person workshops dominate; online still essay-centered.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students overwhelmingly praise fun music-based lectures, workshop drafts, and .

Main concern

Lots of papers and occasional complaints about cancelled classes or .

What students said

“She does reviews of your essays multiple times before the and .”
ENG101
“Ms. Urmston is without a doubt the .”
ENG1C
“Just do the work its not hard and .”
ENGL104

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and music themes, with one complaint about forced music focus.

Main concern

Limited online sample and music-only topics may not fit every English student.

What students said

“I loved Ms. Urmston! Her whole class was about music, which I found enjoyable.”
ENG101
“ opportunities to correct them.”
EGL50
“Analyzing music lyrics should not be for english.”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly scaffolded papers with .

Essay-focusedMultiple draft reviewsPeer workshopsMusic analysis papersLight final exam

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work centers on drafts, workshops, and a and light finals.

Rough draft reviewsPeer workshopsMLA essaysMusic lyric analysis
“Allows you to first turn in a rough draft of workshop the same rough draft with the class.”
ENG101
“Barley had any homework, 3 essays, and . Class is easy”
ENGL50

Online

Limited online comments describe revision essays and music-based prompts without proctoring details.

Revision essaysMusic essay prompts
“ opportunities to correct them.”
EGL50
“ and they weren't too tough or hard to figure out.”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ms. Urmston is without a doubt the and my favorite college professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting writing growth and music themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“She made English so easy for me without making the work easy. She truly cares about her students.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“If you have a .”

📝

90/100

“She does reviews of your essays multiple times before the and .”

🎵 Music Theme

75/100

“She loves music, so a lot of her lessons and and music artists including Bob Dylan.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • She is so sweet and forward with what she needs done.
  • she is a caring and understanding teacher.
  • One of the , and inspiring teachers.

Theme 2

✍️ About Writing Growth

  • she made it very clear to me that I have it in me
  • I could never write a paper before I took her class but .
  • she boosted my confidence in writing.

Theme 3

🎵 About Music Themes

  • Her whole class was about music, which I found enjoyable.
  • .
  • She loves The Beatles.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

62

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews across many years with and music-based writing, mostly in person.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 550
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG10119 reviews
ENG508 reviews
ENGLISH505 reviews
ENGL1043 reviews
ENGL503 reviews
Show 9 more courses
EGL502 reviews
ENG452 reviews
ENGL1012 reviews
429741 review
487641 review
ENG1C1 review
ENG6ENG501 review
ENGLISH1A1 review
ENGLISH6430841 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

34 reported outcomes

A range

26

A+ 7 · A 19

B range

5

B+ 5

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 1