AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Keiry Borruel

PSYC217 · PSYC121 · PSYC213 · PSYC101 · PSYC215 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
86.05%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will do Hawkes or Jamovi weekly and ask for help early—she wants you to pass.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHilarious and caringStats-friendly supportExtra creditAccessible outside classHawkes and Jamovi heavy
  • PSYC101 feels easy with ; PSYC215 stats needs weekly software work.
  • She is widely praised for help videos, outreach when grades drop, and .
  • A minority report cancelled classes, confusing SPSS work, or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Intro psych is an easy A with attendance and study guides; but many still land A or A- with her help.

In-person psych reads easiest; online and stats need more consistent effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

PSYC101 content is accessible, but PSYC215 is real stats with software and weekly problem sets.

Online stats often described as the hardest class taken; in-person psych called straightforward.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

; showing up is repeatedly tied to success.

In-person more often mandatory; some online sections optional.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

About 86% would take again and and stats courses for the support.

In-person recommendation is warmer; online has more polarizing outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

, and extensions when students communicate; essays can still feel strict.

Format shift

In-person stats praise hard-to-fail design; .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

PSYC101 is light; stats adds weekly Hawkes, Jamovi or SPSS projects, and reading.

Format shift

Online and ; intro psych lighter.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

, and proactive help define most reviews despite a few cancel or confusion complaints.

Format shift

In-person personality shines; online quality more mixed on software support.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and major papers or projects.

Format shift

Stats leans software projects and exams; psych leans discussions and topic papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students rave about humor, , and hard-to-fail stats design with .

Main concern

Stats still heavy with Hawkes and projects; rare reports of frequent cancellations.

What students said

“Her class is insanely easy to pass because her study guides/slide notes are exact what the .”
PSYC101
“Professor Borruel sets her course up so that it's DIFFICULT to fail.”
PSYC215
“ .”
PSYC215

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online stats and psych work if you keep up; she answers emails, sends help videos, but some call SPSS or .

Main concern

Compressed online stats can feel packed; a .

What students said

“if to get help”
PSYC215
“ .”
PSYC215
“The final was a 5 page paper about a psychological topic, wasn't that bad.”
PSYC101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests often align with slides or study guides and sometimes open note; .

Open note testsStudy guides match testsJamovi-based finalsExtra credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person stats and psych often use open-note or study-guide-aligned tests plus Jamovi projects similar to the final.

Open noteStudy guides match testsJamovi projects
“ .”
PSYC215
“her study guides/slide notes are exact what the ”
PSYC101
“final and jamovi”
PSYC215

Online

and help videos more than proctoring; exams not described as webcam-locked.

Software homeworkHelp videosPaper finals
“she will even if its outside her office hours!”
PSYC215
“the and lots of opportunities were given for credit”
PSYC213

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if you struggle in math she is the teacher you want”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews (14 online, 29 in person), highlighting support, stats workload, and humor. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“ and I am so glad I had her as my professor.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“ ”

🆘 Student Support

88/100

“She really goes out of her way to help.”

📚 Workload Reality

48/100

“Get ready to read lots and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's HILARIOUS! Love her personality and empathy for students.
  • she teaches as if you're having a conversation with a friend
  • she's really good at explaing it

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it's DIFFICULT to fail
  • Her class is insanely easy to pass
  • course material is complicated, especially w/o a

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she really shows concern for her students' success
  • she really does help.
  • one of the VVC

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

43 reviews with solid detail across psych and stats, mostly consistent on care and support, with and SPSS.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 57
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PSYC21523 reviews
PSYC10112 reviews
psyc2174 reviews
PSYC1212 reviews
PSYC2132 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

25

A+ 5 · A 14 · A- 6

B range

7

B+ 1 · B 6

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1