AI Rate Professor

English

Brittany Morgan

ENGL101 · ENGLC1000 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
47.37%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Prefer her in person only if and strict direction-following; many online students say avoid.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing online vs in-person12-sentence paragraphsSlow gradingHeavy discussionsTough on missed work
  • and ; online and recent ENGL-C1000 reviews are harsh.
  • mandatory 12-sentence paragraphs, slow , and .
  • Experience and how strictly you follow directions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Content can be doable but , and heavy weight on few tasks make an A unreliable especially online.

In-person positives report easier As; online and some and D+ outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Material is standard English composition; difficulty comes from volume, 12-sentence rules, and .

Both formats call work tedious more than intellectually hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Some sections optional attendance, others mandatory; not strictly required.

In-person more often mandatory participation; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

Would-take-again near 47% with a hard split—strong in-person .

In-person recommendation much higher; online majority negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and zeros for minor direction misses; some in-person call her lenient.

Format shift

Online overwhelmingly Strict; in-person mixed Lenient vs Harsh.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

, and long paragraph minimums create a heavy busywork load.

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of papers; online stresses few but .

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

caring lectures and and poor communication for others.

Format shift

In-person averages better; online teaching experience scores poorly.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and papers rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews split between loving her feedback and , and drop threats for absences.

Main concern

and risk of being dropped for missed due dates without warning.

What students said

“She is very lenient and chill. She ensures that the class is on the same pace and .”
ENGL-C1000
“I was dropped from the class without any warning half way through the semester.”
ENGL-C1000
“ and she gave enough time to do them in class so most of the .”
engl101

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online english is frequently rated poorly for , and harsh zeros.

Main concern

, and little grade explanation.

What students said

“She gives few assignments for them to be graded extremely heavily. She takes forever to grade. .”
ENGL-C1000
“If you do not follow directions carefully you get 0 credit for any work you did”
engl101
“Gives you a bad grade without telling you why”
engl101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe traditional proctored exams; risk sits in papers and .

Essay focusedDiscussion posts12-sentence paragraphsPeer review

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and discussions; reviews do not clearly prove a strict proctored exam regime.

EssaysPeer reviewGroup work
“ with each student to review their essay and give advice.”
engl101
“We had 3 essays and read 2 books.”
engl101

Online

Online evidence centers on heavily weighted essays and .

Few heavy essays12-sentence ruleSlow grading
“all paragraphs must be 12 sentences in length stating it is a "college standard" which it is not”
ENGL-C1000
“It's required for majority of assignments to type a minimum of 12 sentences per paragraph.”
engl101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews (8 online, 11 in , and format gaps. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

46/100

“Overall, a very knowledgeable teacher who is good at teaching.”

👎 Online Experience

20/100

“ !”

📝

25/100

“Gives you a bad grade without telling you why”

❤️ In-Person Care

80/100

“Prof. Morgan genuinely cares about the well-being of her students & their success.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Makes teaching fun, helps students at all times
  • she gives you in
  • and terrible at communicating

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class was easy.
  • She gives few assignments for them to be graded extremely heavily.
  • You must participate in group assignments and she gives tones of homework

Theme 3

⚠️ Policy Risks

  • I was dropped from the class without any warning half way through the semester.
  • This professor will also drop you half way through the course for missing 2 assignments
  • She also .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

19 reviews with ; details are rich but opinions are polarized so blended scores are less stable.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 510

Course coverage

engl10115 reviews
ENGL-C10004 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 3 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

3

D+ 3

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2