AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Nichole Verholtz

Courses not reported · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

Take her for a light, fun art or history section if you want an easy A, but if you need strong technical instruction.

Best fit · Easy A HunterFun and CaringExtra Credit FriendlyUneven Teaching QualityEasy Studio WorkOriginal Art Only Rule
  • Most students find her fun, caring, and easy for art and history-style classes.
  • One water-media section was poorly prepared with no demos or .
  • Online experience was harsh with and heavy written work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Most students report A or A+ with easy work and , though one online student earned a .

+; the only online review reported a C and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Content is generally described as easy and fun, with low intellectual challenge except for daily journaling and original-work limits.

In-person studio and history sections feel easy; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

as mandatory while others do not, with no strong penalty narrative overall.

Mixed mandatory and non-mandatory reports across mostly in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and ease, but two strong negative experiences pull the recommendation down.

; the online review is a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and easy A grades are common in person, but online was labeled a .

Format shift

; online described as tough and subjective.

Workload

Light

70/100

Most call work super easy with no textbooks, though one section had daily journals and the online class had many papers.

Format shift

In-person workload light; online had lots of homework and papers.

Teaching experience

Good

62/100

Many praise passion, humor, and fun lectures, but others report no direction, missing demos, or poor online teaching.

Format shift

Stronger praise in person; online and one studio section were weak.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and papers rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and papers; exams are barely mentioned.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Most in-person students call her fun, energetic, and easy, though one studio class lacked direction and she admitted she was not qualified to teach it.

Main concern

Occasional lack of technical demos and a strict original-work-only rule that limits creative options.

What students said

“She was so fun and funny. 100% . All work is super easy too.”
7005
“ and had us buy a bunch of different supplies with no focus on any particular one.”
7005
“This professor has to be one of the most passionate professors I've ever met.”
7005

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review was strongly negative, citing subjective , and a C grade.

Main concern

Subjective prompts and and papers.

What students said

“ unless you have to like me, she was actually a terrible teacher.”
7005

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews barely describe formal exams and instead emphasize projects, journals, and written assignments.

Project basedPapers and journalsLittle exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize studio work and daily journaling with .

Studio projectsDaily journalingOriginal work required
“You're also expected to journal everyday.”
7005

Online

Online and papers rather than proctored exams.

Subjective assignmentsMany papers
“Almost all of her ”
7005

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was so fun and funny. 100% . All work is super easy too.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting mixed teaching quality and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“This professor has to be one of the most passionate professors I've ever met.”

👍 Recommendation Split

68/100

“ unless you have to like me, she was actually a terrible teacher.”

⭐ Easy Workload

70/100

“Classes were easy yet insightful.”

⚠️ Direction Issues

35/100

“She admitted she was not qualified to teach this class. , but you won't learn anything.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very fun professor! Very understanding and willing to help you.
  • She made her lectures so fun.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • All work is super easy too.
  • for actual art classes she will NOT let you do anything that is copyrighted
  • Almost all of her

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She was so fun and funny.
  • , but you won't learn anything.
  • one of the most passionate professors I've ever met

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only six recent reviews with mixed outcomes and ease and personality.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

70056 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 3 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1