AI Rate Professor

Agriculture

Dakota Brooks

AGNR120 · AGNR170 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can keep up with , and deadlines; he rewards effort and keeps class enjoyable.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilarious and OriginalClear FeedbackLecture HeavyTest HeavyFair if You Work
  • Most students praise humor, feedback, and .
  • Courses are lecture and and on-time work required.
  • A minority call him unhelpful or not good at teaching, especially in thin comments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Students can pass and earn strong grades with steady work and , but tough grading and .

Online difficulty ratings run higher; in person includes and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Material is interesting but , and test heavy rather than introductory-easy.

Both formats describe real challenge; online comments emphasize accurate vocabulary and reading.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

as not mandatory, especially online, though participation still matters for some.

; a couple in-person sections mark it mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

75/100

Roughly three in four would take again for humor and .

Online recommendations are mostly strong; in person is positive overall with two thin negatives.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Called a fair grader with and dropped quizzes, .

Format shift

In person highlights buffers; and fair scoring.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect , and timely assignments rather than light busywork.

Format shift

Online is reading and test heavy; in person is lecture and .

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Majority describe him as , and communicative with .

Format shift

Strong online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Tags and comments emphasize tests and and graded assignments.

Format shift

Both formats are test heavy; online also stresses assignment criteria and reading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person he is funny and helpful if you work hard, with , and .

Main concern

Lecture and test load plus occasional comments that .

What students said

“His classes are very lecture heavy but his passion for his subject and humor make it enjoyable.”
AGNR170
“There were a lot of opportunities for , and the was dropped”
AGNR170
“ ”
AGNR-120

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online AGNR170 students , and originality, with challenging but fair work and .

Main concern

, and strict on-time completion for all work.

What students said

“Amazing professor. Lots of reading and viewing, but he teaches the material extremely well and communicates with students.”
AGNR170
“Must complete all work, and on time.”
AGNR170
“Not good at teaching.”
AGNR170

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is standard quiz and and some grade cushions like dropped scores.

Test heavyQuizzes with drop lowestLecture basedClear criteria

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and and a dropped lowest quiz score.

Lecture heavyTest heavyExtra creditDropped lowest quiz
“the was dropped, making it an easy class to pass so long as you did most of the work.”
AGNR170

Online

Online reviews stress tests, reading accuracy, and on-time work with and feedback.

Test heavyClear grading criteriaLots of readingOn-time work required
“Work is challenging, but provides useful and relevant practice.”
AGNR170
“Vocabulary needs to be accurate”
AGNR170

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and he will help you succeed as long as you are willing to put in the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, , and test-heavy structure. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Amazing professor. Lots of reading and viewing, but he teaches the material extremely well and communicates with students.”

👍

75/100

“I would 100% take his class again.”

😂 Humor Factor

85/100

“The professor was funny and probably a furry.”

📚 Work Expectation

48/100

“Be ready to dedicate time to the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very original and funny.
  • his passion for his subject and humor make it enjoyable.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Work is challenging, but provides useful and relevant practice.
  • If your go above and beyond for your work, you will be rewarded.
  • making it an easy class to pass so long as you did most of the work.

Theme 3

⚠️ Critical Notes

  • Not good at teaching.
  • Must complete all work, and on time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve mostly recent reviews show a , but several one-line comments and limited grade detail keep credibility at medium.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

AGNR17010 reviews
AGNR-1202 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values