AI Rate Professor

Languages

Nancy Turner

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Avoid unless and can handle strict testing and attendance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderUnclear test prepStructure-focused ASLStrict about latenessPop quizzes
  • Students felt unprepared for practiced signs.
  • and several say they learned more from YouTube.
  • Strict door-lock lateness policy and tricky testing create high frustration.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

One F and one B with comments about failed first tests and As are not easy.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings are moderate, but structure testing and advertised.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and she locks the door and shows irritability when students are late.

Only in-person evidence; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and one student explicitly does not recommend.

Both negative-to-mixed reviews are in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and tests that shocked the class.

Format shift

In-person only; no online comparison.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Lecture and textbook signs plus tests and pop quizzes; not described as .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Some genuine teaching of signs is noted, but and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Students say tests and structure at chapter ends drive the grade far more than other work.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ASL students report genuine teaching intent but , and strict lateness.

Main concern

Tests emphasize sentence structure students say was not taught, and lateness can lock you out.

What students said

“Testing shocked everyone and everyone mostly failed the first test because they way she did not prepare us for it.”
70347
“I learned more from YouTube; .”
70347

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams focus on ASL structure students felt unprepared for, with pop quizzes and .

Tricky structure testsPop quizzesLecture and textbook signsGraded by few things

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes are a known risk.

Structure sentencing testsPop quizzesUnclear prepStrict attendance
“Testing shocked everyone and everyone mostly failed the first test because they way she did not prepare us for it.”
70347
“ .”
70347

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I learned more from YouTube; .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person , and attendance. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Prep Gap

30/100

“Testing shocked everyone and everyone mostly failed the first test because they way she did not prepare us for it.”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“I learned more from YouTube; .”

⏱️

15/100

“don'tbelateshewilllockthedoorandshowirritability”

Theme 1

📝 About Tests and Grading

  • .
  • testing was tricky and on the structure sentencing
  • everyone mostly failed the first test

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Learning Experience

  • I learned more from YouTube
  • She showed us the signs from the textbook
  • She does have a good genuine way of having everyone learn sign language

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 in-person reviews with consistent concerns, but the sample is too small for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

703472 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values