AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Anh Weis

MATH105 · MAT105 · MATH90 · MATH226 · MATH104 · MATH105MATH85 · 201 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
74.42%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Take Weis if and use tutoring; skip her if you need light load or .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing Math TeacherHeavy HomeworkExtra Credit LifelineTest CorrectionsCaring but Strict
  • Reviews split hard between students who thrive with her structure and those who feel abandoned.
  • Homework load is consistently heavy; quiz and .
  • and Lockdown Browser on some exams.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

An A is reachable with , and , but passive students often land C or lower.

; in-person needs steady class and tutor support.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Algebra and related courses are manageable with practice but feel fast in short terms and heavy on drills.

Accelerated in-person terms feel harder; .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

; skipping often hurts because lectures and .

; many in-person sections expect presence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

About three-quarters would retake her when they put in the work, despite a loud minority of .

Positive and negative extremes appear in both online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Tough on raw tests for some, but , and .

Format shift

Online ; and quiz recovery options.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of and drives many complaints across terms.

Format shift

and in person.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Many call her caring and clear; and .

Format shift

; online is more mixed on interaction quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Weekly homework and frequent quizzes or .

Format shift

Online adds Lockdown Browser for some exams and occasional on-campus finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise caring lectures and , while critics , and tutor dependence.

Main concern

and schedule changes can bury students who fall behind.

What students said

“You get to have a page of notes for the !”
MAT105
“ and time consuming but because it does help your grade.”
MAT105
“The class schedule she gives you in the syllabus will NOT be followed.”
MATH226

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and , but others report tutor-pushing, heavy HW, and proctored exams.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“You do have to take the late work.”
MAT105
“just beware that but lets be honest, you dont need to cheat to pass”
MATH105
“ .”
MAT105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are generally standard difficulty with some student-friendly supports and some proctoring.

Lockdown BrowserOn-Campus Final OptionNote Sheet AllowedQuiz CorrectionsMultiple Choice Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and corrections; timing and reschedules frustrate some students.

Note Sheet AllowedQuiz CorrectionsFrequent Tests
“You get to have a page of notes for the !”
MAT105
“ .”
MAT105

Online

and some finals must be taken on campus.

Lockdown BrowserOn-Campus FinalHomework Extensions
“just beware that but lets be honest, you dont need to cheat to pass”
MATH105
“You do have to take the late work.”
MAT105

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She will work with you as long as you put in the effort!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 mixed reviews, balancing praise for care against workload and clarity complaints. Credibility rating: High.

📚

28/100

“ . Tons of !!”

❤️ Student Support

70/100

“Professor Weis is kind and cares about all of her students.”

🔧 Grade Recovery Tools

58/100

“You can correct your tests that you didnt do well on and .”

🔀 Polarized Experience

60/100

“This professor cannot teach! Confusing and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She assumes that students know and understand mathematics and pushes you off on a tutor
  • and makes sure you understand before she moves on

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and very time consuming but
  • She gives endless amounts of .
  • She's unreasonable with her expectations of .

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

  • You do have to take the
  • You get to have a page of notes for the !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

201

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with clear split opinions still provide rich, , and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5123
4 out of 531
3 out of 510
2 out of 59
1 out of 529

Course coverage

MATH10522 reviews
MAT10517 reviews
MATH2267 reviews
MATH1042 reviews
MATH105MATH851 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH901 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

35 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 3 · A 8

B range

10

B+ 2 · B 5 · B- 3

C range

6

C+ 3 · C 3

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Rather not say 3