AI Rate Professor

Law

Lynne Glickstein

PAL100 · PAL202 · POLS130 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
51/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Use her if you need PAL coursework and can self-drive through heavy reading despite uneven instructor warmth.

Best fit · Self Taught ProKnowledgeable lawyerHomework and reading heavyParticipation mattersUneven communicationPassionate but hit-or-miss
  • Students respect her real-world law knowledge and .
  • Online reviews often cite rudeness, slow responses, and disengagement.
  • Workload is reading- and homework-heavy; grades can still land high if you keep up.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

74/100

Reported grades are strong and several students call the course easy if you follow the syllabus and do the reading.

Both formats show high grades; online also includes frustration despite an A+.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

58/100

Material is approachable but , and writing keep it from feeling trivial.

Online comments stress homework volume more than conceptual difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

while others emphasize participation and class presence.

In-person participation is more stressed; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

About six in and demeanor criticized.

In-person recommendations are warmer; online is more cautious.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Students get As when work is complete, but some call her a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

and advise against stacking her courses.

Format shift

Online reviews most clearly describe the heavy load.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

She is respected for law expertise, but engagement, tone, and lecture focus vary widely by student.

Format shift

In person feels more passionate; online more disconnected for some.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Weekly quizzes, discussions, papers, and .

Format shift

In person is more test and participation heavy; online leans discussions and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students often call her knowledgeable and passionate, with some noting off-track lectures and tougher participation expectations.

Main concern

Lectures can ramble and some students feel she expects too much independence when asking for help.

What students said

“Pretty easy course with a passionate teacher~”
PAL100
“She is tough but means well.”
PAL202
“she can be rude when you ask for help on something”
POLS130

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online experiences range from easy structure and , and disconnected teaching.

Main concern

and tone are inconsistent, and .

What students said

“Response to emails was non existent.”
PAL100
“she is very rude. , but in a rude manner.”
PAL100
“Prof. Glickstein laid out the course to be easily followed and passed.”
PAL100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments center on chapter quizzes and .

Weekly quizzesTest heavyReading-based questions

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation checks based on the book.

Two quizzes each weekParticipation questionsTest reviews
“Had 2 quizzes each week on a chapter from the book.”
PAL100
“Some assignments and .”
PAL202

Online

Online comments emphasize reading, discussions, and .

Discussions and papersSyllabus-driven assignments
“Discussions and .”
PAL100
“ and with lots of reading and writing.”
PAL100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are thinking of taking one of . Do not take them all at once.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, balancing online friction with in-person expertise. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Warning

34/100

“ and with lots of reading and writing.”

⚖️ Law Expertise

70/100

“She is very knowledgeable in law.”

📧 Communication Friction

40/100

“Response to emails was non existent.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Pretty easy course with a passionate teacher~
  • lectures can get boring, she does a great job at keeping everyone interested
  • She also likes to ramble on a lot

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This class was easy but was frustrating.
  • Just do what u gotta do to pass.
  • and concise.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • she is very rude. , but in a rude manner.
  • .
  • and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only 9 reviews with mixed detail and a long time span, so patterns are suggestive rather than definitive.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PAL1006 reviews
PAL2022 reviews
POLS1301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2