AI Rate Professor

Psychology

William Bachofner

PSYC101 · PSYCH101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Online may be solid if you can handle steady work, but .

Best fit · Effort For RewardFormat Split OpinionsLots of HomeworkTest HeavyOnline ResponsiveWorkload Risk
  • Recent online students praise accessibility, daily communication, and video lectures.
  • Older in-person reviews slam absurd assignment volume and .
  • Experience appears highly format and term dependent with small sample size.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Online students earned A and A-plus with engagement, while and heavy work.

Online evidence is friendlier on grades; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Difficulty ratings and comments about volume and scores.

In-person difficulty is higher in comments; online rates around mid difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

and not in others across formats.

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Would-take-again is about 50 percent with online yes and older in-person no.

; in-person reviewers would not.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Online students felt supported; in-person tags call him a .

Format shift

Online leniency looks better than older in-person reports.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Multiple reviews cite lots of homework and one claims over 40 assignments in a week.

Format shift

In-person workload complaints are extreme; online still tags lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Recent online praise for clarity and access is offset .

Format shift

Online teaching experience reads good; in-person reads poor.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of many assignments, participation, and weekly or end-of-week tests.

Format shift

and tests; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews from 2020 describe , and .

Main concern

Claims of 44-plus assignments in a .

What students said

“Waaaaaay too much to do, 44+ assignments in 7 days, as well as ?”
PSYCH101
“A lot of work and not very good at explaining the content. .”
PSYC101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Recent online PSYC101 students found him attentive, engaged, and and interactive activities.

Main concern

Participation and are high.

What students said

“ and responsive. He communicated daily and provided video lectures to help you understand the material”
PSYC101
“I had no problem with Mr.Bachofner he was very attentive and helpful.”
PSYC101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and weekly tests are part of the load, but .

Weekly TestsHomework HeavyVideo Activities Online

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize weekly tests plus huge .

Weekly TestsTest HeavyHeavy Assignment Load
“44+ assignments in 7 days, as well as ?”
PSYCH101

Online

Online reviews mention interactive video activities and homework but .

Video LecturesInteractive ActivitiesParticipation
“provided video lectures to help you understand the material as well as interactive video activities to aid in retention.”
PSYC101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Waaaaaay too much to do, 44+ assignments in 7 days, as well as ?”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews with a . Credibility rating: Low.

🌐 Online Experience

85/100

“ and responsive. He communicated daily and provided video lectures”

📚 Workload Shock

28/100

“Waaaaaay too much to do, 44+ assignments in 7 days, as well as ?”

👎 In-Person Risk

20/100

“A lot of work and not very good at explaining the content. .”

Theme 1

🌐 About Online Class

  • I had no problem with Mr.Bachofner he was very attentive and helpful.
  • I would 100% take his course again.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of
  • Got out of that class real quick after realizing the amount of work he assigns is absurd.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • when given what he requests he states its excessive? .
  • He communicated daily and provided video lectures

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews split evenly by format and era, with sharp disagreement, so confidence in any single picture is limited.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSYC1013 reviews
PSYCH1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1