Keith Shaner

AUTO51 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 46/100
RMP rating: 2.5/5
Take again: 50%
Difficulty: 2.5

The decision

great hands-on shop learning for some, unreliable and unprofessional for others.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHands-On LabsPolarized ReviewsHilariousOften AbsentCaring (mixed)

Older review praises intense hands-on engine rebuild experience
Newer review slams absence, tech issues, and unprofessional habits
Only two reviews create high uncertainty

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student earned a B in a hands-on intensive course; the other left grade blank with low difficulty but poor quality.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Hands-on rebuild work can be demanding, yet one review rated difficulty very low.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; another says skip class and you will not pass.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One enthusiastic yes and one strongly negative no-tech, no-show review cancel out.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

and graded by few things, with only one reported B grade.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Hands-on engine rebuilds imply solid .

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Incredible supportive instructor to one student; absent and unprepared to another.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Core experience is hands-on labs and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person AUTO51 is split: one student ; another says he ditches class and cannot run basic classroom tech.

Main concern

and consistency of instruction.

What students said

“His class is almost completely hands on which is great. We were able to tear down engines and rebuild them from the block.”
AUTO51

“Didn't know how to use YouTube or a projector and constantly flaunted nepotism --- couldn't stop ditching class for fast food.”
AUTO51

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on shop labs; described.

Hands-on labsEngine rebuild projects

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment appears project and lab based; .

Hands-on labsEngine rebuild

“We were able to tear down engines and rebuild them from the block.”
AUTO51

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Shaner is an , and makes coming to class everyday a great experince”
Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting in-person AUTO51 reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

🔧 Hands-On Learning

80/100

“His class is almost completely hands on which is great. We were able to tear down engines and rebuild them from the block.”

🚫 Unreliable Presence

20/100

“couldn't stop ditching class for fast food. Absent.”

🤷 Split Recommendation

50/100

“I cannot believe how much I learned in such a short time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

almost completely hands on which is great
Didn't know how to use YouTube or a projector
extremely supportive

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

Hilarious
Caring
constantly flaunted nepotism

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting reviews years apart yield low credibility for stable conclusions.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50

4 out of 51

3 out of 50

2 out of 50

1 out of 51

Course coverage

AUTO512 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

B 1

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values