AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Darryl Henry

PHILOSOPHY6 · PHIL109 · PHIL101 · PHIL67 · PHIL6 · PHIL120 · PHIL122 · PHILO6 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you can handle dry, rigid philosophy lectures and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDry humorArrogantTough graderMany papersBoring lectures
  • some praise dry humor and deep learning, many call him boring, arrogant, or unhelpful
  • and tough grading
  • One recent online student found PHIL101 easy via Zoom lectures

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

and many papers; some note class-wide low first-test scores despite occasional A grades.

Online review describes an easy class; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Average difficulty is elevated with frequent comments , and dense philosophy.

Online PHIL101 felt easy; in-person courses are described as tough and dry.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

; one in-person review says yes, while most older reviews omit it.

; limited in-person notes say mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

, but older comments split between sage praise and teaching disaster.

Recent online and one strong in-person yes contrast with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

, and delayed or missing feedback on work.

Format shift

; online student earned a B without grade complaints.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Multiple comments cite many papers, focus questions, lots of work, and .

Format shift

Online review called the class easy; and workload.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

dry humor and deep learning for some, powerpoints, boredom, and arrogance for others.

Format shift

; in-person delivery is frequently called dry or cold.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of papers, focus questions, and .

Format shift

In-person evidence dominates; online review does not detail assessment split.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person philosophy ranges from sage-like rigor to dry, arrogant, and .

Main concern

Boring delivery, condescension, late work return, and .

What students said

“He is also very arrogant and condescending and demands silence during class.”
PHIL101
“he reads powerpoints instead of teaching, and when the time comes to take a thing and then make the .”
PHIL122

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One recent online PHIL101 and the class super easy for self-paced learning.

Main concern

Only one online review, so experience may not generalize.

What students said

“It was a super easy class, the prof zoom lectures are easy to understand which is great for teaching yourself.”
PHIL101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams can feel strict or unpredictable, with reports of studying one topic then testing another.

In-class testsMismatched study guidesPaper-heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; papers and focus questions dominate.

Mismatched testsMany papersFocus questions
“when the time comes to take a thing and then make the .”
PHIL122
“Almost everyone in my class recieved an F or a D on the first test.”
PHIL101

Online

Online review does not clearly describe proctoring or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is also very arrogant and condescending and demands silence during class. I learned A LOT from him though, he is a sage and I think he has a right to be arrogant.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (1 online, 10 in-person) spanning two decades of . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“He is awful. he reads powerpoints instead of teaching”

😂 Dry Humor Appeal

70/100

“Henry's dry humor is awesome.”

⚖️

30/100

“Almost everyone in my class recieved an F or a D on the first test.”

💻 Online Ease

75/100

“It was a super easy class, the prof zoom lectures are easy to understand which is great for teaching yourself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Dry, boring, cold.
  • he reads powerpoints instead of teaching
  • Very rigid and strict.
  • the prof zoom lectures are easy to understand

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It was a tough class!
  • Almost everyone in my class recieved an F or a D on the first test.
  • So many papers
  • It was a super easy class

Theme 3

😤 About Character

  • He is also very arrogant and condescending
  • Can be awfully arrogant and condescending at times.
  • Treated most of the class like we were kindergardeners.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews span 2002-2024 with consistent dry/arrogant themes but sparse modern detail and few grades reported.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PHIL1014 reviews
PHIL1091 review
PHIL1201 review
PHIL1221 review
PHIL61 review
Show 3 more courses
PHIL671 review
PHILO61 review
PHILOSOPHY61 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values