AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Omar Vega

SOC104 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you need SOC-104 and can document accommodations carefully with the school.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDoes not follow accommodationsParticipation biasLecture heavyClear grading criteriaMandatory attendance
  • Single review alleges he ignores Access accommodations and makes his own rules.
  • Student felt bias against those who skip the volunteer clean-up for the alternate assignment.
  • and participation matters despite an A+ grade outcome.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

The reviewer earned an A+ but .

All evidence is from the single in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty is rated 3 with lecture-heavy and participation-focused structure, not extreme content.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as mandatory and participation matters in the only review.

Evidence comes only from the in-person review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

and the only narrative is strongly negative on fairness.

No online recommendation data; in-person review is cautionary.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

, but bias concerns undercut perceived fairness.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Lecture-heavy class with a volunteer clean-up or alternate assignment; volume is not described as extreme.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Quality is average on the rating scale, but the written account focuses on control and accommodation failures.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Participation and a community clean-up or alternate assignment matter alongside regular course work.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One in-person student criticizes accommodation handling and perceived participation bias.

Main concern

Accommodation noncompliance and perceived bias on volunteer versus alternate work.

What students said

“Prof. Vega does not know how to follow the accommodations provided by Access.”
SOC-104

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Participation mattersLecture heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, or closed-book rules.

Participation mattersLecture heavy
“One of his assignments is to volunteer at a local clean-up day, and I feel that he is biased toward students who don't participate and .”
SOC-104

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prof. Vega does not know how to follow the accommodations provided by Access.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review only. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Accommodation Concerns

20/100

“Prof. Vega does not know how to follow the accommodations provided by Access.”

⚖️ Fairness Concerns

30/100

“I feel that he is biased toward students who don't participate and .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“he thinks that in his classroom, he is God and gets to make his own rules.”

Theme 1

⚖️ About Fairness

  • does not know how to follow the accommodations provided by Access
  • biased toward students who don't participate
  • gets to make his own rules

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Class Structure

  • Participation matters
  • Lecture heavy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed 2024 review exists, so conclusions rest on a single narrative.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SOC-1041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values