AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Marc Skuster

PHIL109 · PHIL10170436 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you will keep up with the reading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGives Good FeedbackClear InstructionsGet Ready to ReadExtra CreditWell Organized
  • Online and fast feedback.
  • , and short reflections plus substantial reading.
  • Students who follow instructions usually report an A is very achievable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

and weekly work reliably earns an A.

All evidence is from online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, though reading volume is real.

All evidence is from online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

72/100

, but the online structure is mainly weekly posts and .

All evidence is from online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Three of four voices are strongly positive, with one student rejecting the .

All evidence is from online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, and good feedback make grades feel attainable when work is complete.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Weekly discussions, quizzes, and reflections are manageable, but .

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students , and clear expectations.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment centers on discussions, quizzes, and reflections rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All four reviews are online and mostly praise organization, feedback, and .

Main concern

terms.

What students said

“He's well organized & gives clear .”
PHIL-109
“if you do what he asks there no way you shouldn't pass with an A.”
PHIL10170436
“I feel like he was a however the amount of .”
PHIL10170436

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly weekly quizzes and written work with .

Weekly QuizzesDiscussionsReflectionsClear Instructions

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

, and reflections with no mention of webcam proctoring.

Weekly QuizzesDiscussionsReflectionsExtra Credit
“mostly weekly discussions & quizzes which is not too difficult overall.”
PHIL-109
“we got 3 , and a reflection and they weren't too bad.”
PHIL10170436

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if you do what he asks there no way you shouldn't pass with an A. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 , and grading clarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“He's well organized & gives clear .”

🅰️ Easy A Potential

82/100

“if you do what he asks there no way you shouldn't pass with an A.”

📖 Reading Load

55/100

“the amount of .”

👍 Recommendation

82/100

“wonderful course & professor. :)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great so it makes the class really easy to follow along with.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The classwork is easy and he gives a good description of what he wants
  • Its quite a bit of reading but nothing too extensive
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four consistent online reviews over several years support the pattern, but the sample is still small and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL101704363 reviews
PHIL-1091 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1