AI Rate Professor

Communication

Cristina Mancillas

COS108 · CMST109 · COMM101 · CMT73947 · CMST106 · CMST108 · COS126 · COM100 · COMM100 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
34.29%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you only need an easy A and can tolerate chaos, late grades, and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterUnorganizedLate GradingLots of HomeworkGroup ProjectsPolarizing
  • Many students report chronic disorganization, late grades, and .
  • Letter grades are often high if you submit the work, so an A can still come with a bad experience.
  • A vocal minority finds her caring and fun, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Many A and A+ reports plus lenient late work mean high grades are common if .

Both formats show high grades despite frustration; complaints are more about process than letter grade.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Public-speaking content itself is not intellectually hard, but volume and clarity issues create friction.

Online feels more chaotic; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

and note that missing class hurts notes and participation.

; in-person almost always treats showing up as required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

and negative reviews about organization and clarity heavily outweigh praise.

Online ; in-person is polarized but still net negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

and late-work leniency help many students earn As .

Format shift

; online focuses more on missing grades than harsh cuts.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Repeated reports of , and endless research tasks.

Format shift

; online adds weekly overload without timely feedback.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

, and occasional hostility dominate student tone.

Format shift

Online reviews are especially harsh; but still many poor ratings.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Speeches, papers, group projects, and exams.

Format shift

Applies to both formats with little detailed proctoring discussion.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person classes swing between warm interactive vibes and harsh reports of , and busywork.

Main concern

, and heavy research or group load.

What students said

“RUN FOR YOUR LIFE! If you like your time wasted, this class is for you.”
CMST106
“ ! All the ratings are true she is a terrible professor.”
CMST109
“ , and a rare gem.”
CMST109

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections draw strong complaints about mean responses, no grades entered, heavy weekly work, and .

Main concern

Disorganization and poor communication are especially painful online.

What students said

“By the end of the semester, I still didn't have a single grade in the grade book for ”
CMST106
“ .”
CMST108
“you cant ask questions without her getting mad. .”
CMST108

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on speeches, papers, and projects; reviews do .

SpeechesGroup ProjectsResearch PapersParticipation

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and papers rather than documented proctored finals.

SpeechesGroup ProjectsResearch PapersMemorization
“There are about 5 speeches, but she'll help you with them if you need it.”
CMST109
“Way too much research, not enough actually improving public speaking.”
CMST109

Online

Online reviews emphasize weekly assignments and participation more than webcam or lockdown exams.

Weekly AssignmentsParticipationLecture Heavy
“Lecture heavy class with so .”
CMST106

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“RUN FOR YOUR LIFE! If you like your time wasted, this class is for you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews (4 online, 31 in person), highlighting organization failures and grade-experience split. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ .”

📄

20/100

“there are still 29 ungraded huge and tedious assignments dating back to week 2”

🅰️ Easy Grade Paradox

80/100

“Passed this class w/flying colors. ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“ !!!!”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Organization

  • She has no organization whatsoever
  • I never received a syllabus from her

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Communications has been one of the easiest college classes I've ever taken
  • you will do A plus work, but she will grade you as an F

Theme 3

💬 About Classroom Tone

  • She antagonizes students when they ask genuine questions
  • warm, family-like atmosphere
  • you cant ask questions without her getting mad

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-five reviews over several years form a large, polarized but thematically consistent record of disorganization and easy grades.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 521

Course coverage

CMST10916 reviews
CMST1067 reviews
CMST1083 reviews
COMM1003 reviews
COM1002 reviews
Show 4 more courses
CMT739471 review
COMM1011 review
COS1081 review
COS1261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 9 · A 9

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

13

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 5