Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
62/100Many and work is done, but it is not a free A and some struggled hard online.
Older and some online comments describe retakeable labs and easy tests; newer online CIS101 posts emphasize heavy effort and .
CIS101 · CIS136 · CISCIS · CIS280 · ONLINE · CIS90 · CIS101CIS91A · CIS36 · CIS81 · 39 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Many x x x x x x x and work is done, but it is not a free A and some struggled hard online.
Older and some online comments describe retakeable labs and easy tests; newer online CIS101 posts emphasize heavy effort and x x.
Is the course easy?
Intro CIS content is manageable with lecture help, but x x, and volume of material keep it from feeling trivial.
x x x x x x; online reviews more often call it hard or platform-heavy.
Is attendance flexible?
Many reviews list attendance mandatory or say skipping lectures tanks x x x x x x x.
Both formats mention mandatory attendance on several CIS101 and CIS90 forms; a x x x x x x x but still key.
Is this professor recommended?
About 82% would take again and most in-person praise is strong, tempered by repeated online complaints.
x x x x x; online recommendation is polarized.
Course guide
Grading
Fair
58/100
Feedback and x x x x x x x x terms, but tough-grader and F grades also show up.
Format shift
Online has more tough-grader tags; x x x x x x x.
Workload
Moderate
42/100
Lots of x x x, and x x x x x x.
Format shift
Online CIS101 especially flags lots of homework and test heavy; some light in-person CIS81 notes exist.
Teaching experience
Good
74/100
Strong caring, helpful, and lecture praise offline outweighs a minority of confusing or unresponsive online reports.
Format shift
In-person teaching reputation is clearly stronger than online involvement.
Assessment method
Balanced
58/100
x x x x, and finals all matter; midterms often rehash lab work.
Format shift
x x x x x x; a few light courses were quiz-only.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
In-person students mostly call him a x x x x x x x x x x and exams tied to lecture work.
Main concern
Workload and clarity of x x x; attendance and lecture matter for success.
What students said
“Professor Thomas is a great lecturer and cares about having the students succeed in his class.”
“Great teacher! Super caring and detail oriented!”
“Shane was an excellent teacher.”
Remote format
Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
Online CIS101 experiences are mixed: some pass with retakeable labs and x x, while others hit a x x x x x, and weak question support.
Main concern
Dysfunctional or x x x x x x and inconsistent instructor responsiveness.
What students said
“He operates on a site that is totally dysfunctional and hard to use”
“x x x x x x x x x the grade you want.”
“Professor Thomas was horrible at answering questions.”
Exam style
Exams are typically standard course tests tied to labs and x x x x x x x.
Assessment risk
Standard
55/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
x x and finals often feel hard at first but mainly rehash labs; some x x x x x x.
“Midterm and x x x x x but is mostly a rehash of x x.”
“x x x x x x x x x the book.”
Online reviews mention heavy tests and weekly due Sundays on x x x x x x x x.
“Tests and x x x x x.”
“Lots of lab work and tests.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“One of the few professors still around that actually cares about students learning. Be expected to sit down and work for a grade - struggling to learn. But struggle is rewarded.”
“Super caring and detail oriented! Always answered my questions and helped the students with any questions we had!”
“He operates on a site that is totally dysfunctional and hard to use”
“Lots of lab work and tests. x x x x x x x”
“I've taken all the classes this professor offers.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
39
Recent reviews read by the AI
39
Lifetime ratings
86/100
Evidence confidence
39 reviews spanning 2003-2025 with detailed mixed comments, clear online vs in-person split, and consistent core themes.
Inside 39 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
11 reported outcomes
A+ 1 · A 6
No reported values
C 1
No reported values
F 2
Not sure yet 1