AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Mayda Medrano

CHDV106 · CHDV239 · CHDV240 · CHLD84 · AA3836 · CHDV134 · CDHV106 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
70%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you follow rubrics and stay on top of weekly posts—vet the online section carefully.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesGives good feedbackParticipation mattersOpen-book quizzesVague online rubrics
  • Most students praise caring, knowledgeable teaching and
  • open-book exams and and
  • but manageable;

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many As and Bs with open-book exams; effort on papers and participation is required but doable.

; one online student needed outside help for an A.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Low average difficulty with reading, discussions, and .

Both formats rate difficulty low; online has more writing volume.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

52/100

Some sections .

Online and and optional.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

About 70% would take again with many strong endorsements despite a few harsh online critiques.

In-person more consistently positive; online more polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and open-book quizzes; some vagueness can frustrate.

Format shift

; .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Weekly discussions, essays, quizzes, projects, and lots of reading/papers.

Format shift

Online especially paper- and discussion-heavy.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

; minority report vague online instructions.

Format shift

In-person teaching highly praised; online quality more uneven.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of , and quizzes.

Format shift

; in-person emphasizes lectures and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Strong lectures, resources, and accessibility; students call her knowledgeable and helpful.

Main concern

Older sparse comments add less detail than recent ones.

What students said

“She is knowledgeable and provides resources to have a ”
CHDV240
“The to stay motivated”
CHDV106

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and , but some report vague instructions, slow grading, and unclear rubrics.

Main concern

Vague online directions and .

What students said

“Quizzes and !”
CHDV106
“very vague and does not give out examples on what she wants.”
CHDV239
“ within a decent time”
CHDV106

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

At least and exams; other formats not fully specified.

Open BookQuizzes and examsMidterm and final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews ; focus is lectures, feedback, and projects.

Group projectsLecture-based
“Great lectures, and is very knowledgeable.”
CHDV240

Online

Quizzes and exams described as open book; weekly posts and essays also graded.

Open BookWeekly quizzesMidterm and final
“Quizzes and !”
CHDV106
“There are and family, and a midterm and .”
CDHV106

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I absolutely loved the class and this class was one of ! 100% recommend”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews (7 online, 5 in-person), highlighting feedback strengths and online inconsistency. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“She is knowledgeable and provides resources to have a ”

📘 Open-Book Exams

85/100

“Quizzes and !”

⚠️ Online Clarity Risk

30/100

“very vague and does not give out examples on what she wants.”

👍 Recommendation

72/100

“100% recommend”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just put in the effort and follow rubrics
  • It is a lot, but it is manageable
  • Quizzes and !

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • online instructions included a lot of errors
  • never graded anything within a decent time
  • Be prepared to read and write a lot

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews spanning 2009-2023 with , and online variance.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHDV1063 reviews
CHDV1342 reviews
CHDV2392 reviews
CHDV2402 reviews
AA38361 review
Show 2 more courses
CDHV1061 review
CHLD841 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1