AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Eluojor Onnekikami

PSYC108 · PSYC110 · PYCH101 · PSY108 · PSYCH110 · PYCH110 · PYS110 · PSY101 · PYSCH108 · PSY110 · PYCH121 · PYSCH110 · PSYC101 · PSYCH101 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
79.41%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want an engaging, work-heavy psych class and and communication.

Best fit · Effort For RewardInspirationalLots of PapersCaring but UnevenParticipation HeavyEmail Response Issues
  • Many students love his humor, inspiration, and growth-focused discussions.
  • Workload is heavy with reading, papers, and .
  • A vocal minority report , and PowerPoint-only lectures.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Hard work is rewarded, but several students say perfect scores are withheld and .

Both formats mention fair effort rewards; online reviews more and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

Material is learnable but reading-heavy and paper-heavy, so intellectual load sits in the middle rather than easy.

In-person and and writing volume.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

as mandatory and , though a few sections mark it optional.

and in-person metadata and comments.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and learning, but a sizable minority strongly advise avoiding him.

; online reviews are more mixed on communication.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Many say you earn what you work for, while others report , and .

Format shift

Online reviews ; in-person reviews are more split.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Frequent tags and comments cite lots of , and multi-page papers.

Format shift

Heavy workload is reported in both formats.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Often called inspirational, funny, and caring, yet criticized for slide-reading lectures and weak email responsiveness.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is warmer; online students more often mention distance and delayed replies.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of homework, discussions, research papers, participation, and focus.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews often praise inspirational lectures and discussions, but also warn about lots of , and occasional unfair or .

Main concern

Heavy writing load and .

What students said

“Lots of writing but you will learn a lot.”
PSY101
“Awesome professor but if you do not want to work hard.”
PSYC101
“Expect to write a 15 pg research paper along with 4-5 pages of .”
PSY108

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some call him caring and rewarding of hard work, while , and unfair homework or .

Main concern

Slow or and self-teaching .

What students said

“He's a really caring teacher and his material is not difficult. As long as you do the work you should be good”
PSYC101
“If you need help or have a question, don't expect him to get back to you asap.”
PSY110
“ and gets mad when you ask in class.”
PSYC101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams exist but , and participation drive much of the grade; reviews do not clearly prove open-book or proctored software rules.

Participation MattersResearch PapersFlash Cards HelpfulPowerPoint LecturesHomework Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

56/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation; flash cards are mentioned as helpful and no lockdown-style tools are clearly described.

Research PapersParticipation CreditFlash Cards for Tests
“ . Really easy and fun!”
PSY101
“Expect to write a 15 pg research paper along with 4-5 pages of .”
PSY108

Online

Online reviews mention finals and graded work but do not clearly prove proctoring tools; .

Final Exam Wording IssuesHomework Graded Strictly
“his english isn't always perfect, so some of the questions on the .”
PSY110
“Does not correct the and says will grade how he feels at the end of course.”
PSYC101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is one of the period.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews (6 online, 28 in person), highlighting inspiration versus workload and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“This Professor was absolutely terrific. He is so knowledgeable on the subject and has definitely helped me develop and grow my own knowledge.”

📝 Workload Load

28/100

“Lots of work but .”

👍 Recommendation Split

78/100

“Simply the . I got a lot out of his class.”

⚖️

52/100

“He is the type of professor that refuses to give you 100%. It will always be 28/30 and he will not tell you why.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The to share their experiences.
  • Learning was fun, interactive, and interesting.
  • Lectures are a waste of time, because he goes through them too quickly and only reads off PowerPoint.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Not difficult, you get the grade you earn but assign a lot of work.
  • He rewards hard workers with a good grade.
  • Does not grade fairly!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very funny Professor and great teacher
  • He often encouraged us to aim high in our professional and personal lives.
  • He is wonderful! So funny and easy to talk to

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-four reviews across online and inspiration praise and complaints about workload and grading fairness.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

PSY1108 reviews
PSY1016 reviews
PSYC1013 reviews
PSYC1103 reviews
PSY1082 reviews
Show 9 more courses
PSYCH1012 reviews
PSYCH1102 reviews
PYCH1102 reviews
PSYC1081 review
PYCH1011 review
PYCH1211 review
PYS1101 review
PYSCH1081 review
PYSCH1101 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Rather not say 1