AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Cass Reiji

CIS101 · CIS121 · CIS205 · CIS201 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid this professor; students overwhelmingly call the , and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderHard to UnderstandTest HeavyUnclear InstructionsWorst Teacher
  • Near-universal quality scores of 1 with .
  • and little feedback.
  • , and heavy test-focused work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Some students still earn A grades, but tough zero-for-one-mistake grading and and high-effort.

The only easy A style comments come from one 2013 online review; .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Difficulty ratings cluster at 4-5 and comments , and test-heavy work.

Online has one easy outlier; in-person consistently reports high difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Attendance is listed mandatory in several reviews and .

; online evidence is sparse.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

and comments repeatedly call her the .

Both formats lean negative; the sole warmer online note is old and does not reverse the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Students report zeros for single mistakes, F on unexplained errors, and .

Format shift

; the easy online review is an outdated outlier.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and constant assignment pressure appear repeatedly.

Format shift

Workload complaints are stronger in-person; one .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students say lectures are unintelligible, quizzes have errors, and .

Format shift

In-person reviews are scathing; online is mixed but too thin to offset the pattern.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Test heavy tags and than supportive practice work.

Format shift

and harsh assignment scoring more clearly.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are almost uniformly negative, , and lectures that just read the book.

Main concern

Harsh zero-tolerance grading and .

What students said

“ ! Can't understand her accent and she will give you a 0 out of 100 if you make 1 mistake on any assignment.”
CIS201
“She makes lots of mistakes. Her quizzes have many errors. .”
CIS201
“ is read the book word for word as her lecture.”
CIS201

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One very old easy online CIS101 review contrasts with a harsh online CIS205 review calling it hard to understand with heavy work.

Main concern

and ; the easy review is from 2013.

What students said

“Hard to understand”
CIS205
“Really easy class. and 85% of the time.”
CIS101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are described as error-prone and harshly graded, with little evidence of open-book or lenient formats.

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests but do not clearly document proctoring tools or open-book policy.

Test heavyHarsh quiz grading
“ .”
CIS201
“She was a . One thing wrong with an .”
CIS201

Online

One old online review says answers can often be googled; a later online review only notes the class is hard to understand.

Open web lookup possible (old review)
“all quizzes and 85% of the time”
CIS101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! Can't understand her accent and she will give you a 0 out of 100 if you make 1 mistake on any assignment.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 , and near-zero recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Quality Collapse

15/100

“Probably the . She will give you an F on an assignment but .”

🚫 Recommendation Free-Fall

8/100

“ !!!!!!!!!!!”

⚖️

12/100

“she will give you a 0 out of 100 if you make 1 mistake on any assignment.”

📚

18/100

“ . Just terrible as an instructor!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • all she does is read the book word for word as her lecture
  • Hard to understand
  • She makes lots of mistakes. .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • give you a 0 out of 100 if you make 1 mistake
  • I shouldve dropped when I had the chance

Theme 3

💔 About Overall Experience

  • !
  • Bad professor
  • Just terrible as an instructor!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across several years are directionally consistent on poor teaching and , though many comments are short and one positive outlier is very old.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 58

Course coverage

CIS2015 reviews
CIS1012 reviews
CIS1211 review
CIS2051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 2