AI Rate Professor

Communication

Freddi Schweizer-Gold

CMST107 · SPEECH107 · FAMCOMMUNICATI · COMM105 · FAMILYCOMMUN · COMMUNICATIONS · CMST105 · FAM107 · CMST106 · SPEECH · SPH106 · SPCH106 · FAMILYCOMM · SPCH107 · INTERCOMM · FAMILYCOMMUNIC · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can self-manage messy due dates and group work; expect uneven communication and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing and UnorganizedGroup Projects OnlineEasy If You Submit On TimeUnclear InstructionsSlow Grading
  • Reviews are sharply split between Easy A claims and .
  • Online sections often pile discussion posts and .
  • Organization, tone, and risks.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

72/100

Many students report A or A+ with on-time work and little textbook use, though and hard work also appear.

Online comments more often call it Easy A; in-person comments more often stress tough or .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Several call it a survey-style easy class, while others feel frustrated by volume and .

Online reviews lean easier on content; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Online often has no attendance requirement, while .

Online evidence leans optional; as yes.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

About half would take her again; praise for .

Online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Some call her a gentle or fair grader with ; others report tough grading and .

Format shift

; older in-person reviews complain more about tone.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

, and group projects add up, especially in packed summer or online weeks.

Format shift

Online workload complaints focus on weekly posts and group work.

Teaching experience

Average

42/100

Quality averages near 2.9 with both five-star inspiration and .

Format shift

Online and in-person both polarize; organization issues appear in both.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of discussions, projects, midterms, finals, and .

Format shift

Online emphasizes discussions and group projects; and final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person and mixed-format comments still split hard: some call her creative and .

Main concern

Inconsistent organization, defensive responses, and .

What students said

“At least she grades easy.”
COMM105
“Had us study for final and then two days .”
FAM107
“She is super informative and a really sweet woman.”
SPCH107

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections often feel easy on content but , and unclear expectations.

Main concern

Group projects and ambiguous instructions in a fully online setting.

What students said

“Packs each week with assignments and difficult to keep up with.”
CMST105
“difficult to contact teammates”
CMST105
“Easy A+. as long as you turn in ur work on time.”
CMST107

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Common pattern is midterm plus final or ; strict proctoring is not clearly proven.

Midterm and FinalEssay FinalDiscussion HeavyGroup ProjectExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person and older mixed comments mention essay finals, surprise format changes, and study guides that may not match tests.

Essay FinalSurprise Format ChangesStudy Guide Mismatch
“Her final exam is an essay of about 600 words.”
CMST107
“Had us study for final and then two days .”
FAM107
“ you read.”
COMM105

Online

Online and final, and group projects; open-book or webcam rules are not clearly stated.

Weekly DiscussionsMidterm and FinalGroup ProjectsExtra Credit
“The work includes chapter work, a midterm and final, group project, identity collage, 600 word post”
CMST105
“ . Didn't use the books at all. 2 Group projects”
CMST107
“Questions about her ”
CMST105

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly because of all her negative reviews. Some of it was true. The due dates are a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews (11 online, 24 in person), highlighting polarization on organization, group work, and easy grades. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“for being a communications teacher she isnt very good at communicating clearly.”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ . Packs each week with assignments and difficult to keep up with.”

📝 Easy Grade Path

72/100

“Easiest class I have taken. I did not open the book once and received and A in the class.”

🧩 Organization Risk

30/100

“ . ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching and Tone

  • Teacher comes off as rude sometimes and
  • She is super informative and a really sweet woman
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A+. as long as you turn in ur work on time
  • she is a
  • I still pass the class with an A, but you would Have to work really hard

Theme 3

🧩 About Online Structure

  • She puts us in groups and we even have to do a group project
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-five reviews across many years with both formats and repeating organization versus easy-grade themes.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 54
3 out of 56
2 out of 56
1 out of 59

Course coverage

CMST10510 reviews
CMST1076 reviews
SPCH1073 reviews
CMST1062 reviews
COMM1052 reviews
Show 11 more courses
SPEECH1072 reviews
COMMUNICATIONS1 review
FAM1071 review
FAMCOMMUNICATI1 review
FAMILYCOMM1 review
FAMILYCOMMUN1 review
FAMILYCOMMUNIC1 review
INTERCOMM1 review
SPCH1061 review
SPEECH1 review
SPH1061 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1