Is this an easy A?
HardWork
38/100Online intro can be an A if you submit on time, but programming and heavy projects.
Online CIS101 comments lean easier with resubmits; in-person CIS201 reports tough grading and frustration.
CIS101ONLINE · CIS101 · CIS32A · CIS201ONLINE · CIS · CIS137 · CSI201 · CIS201 · COMPUTERS · INTROHTML · CIS0 · CIS206 · CIS1 · 35 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Online intro can be an A if you submit on time, but programming x x x x x and heavy projects.
Online CIS101 comments lean easier with resubmits; in-person CIS201 reports tough grading and frustration.
Is the course easy?
Intro literacy can feel light, but programming and HTML sections demand prior skill and independent problem solving.
Online intro difficulty ratings run lower than in-person CIS201 and CIS206.
Is attendance flexible?
x x x x x while others say class is pointless and skippable because lectures only read the book.
Evidence is mixed across both formats with no single consistent policy.
Is this professor recommended?
x x x and many reviews say stay away, especially for in-person programming courses.
A few online CIS101 students would retake; most in-person CIS201 students would not.
Course guide
Grading
Harsh
28/100
x x x and comments about F marks with x x x x x x.
Format shift
Online sometimes allows resubmits; x x x x and less explained.
Workload
Heavy
38/100
Lots of x x x, and reading show up often, especially in CIS201 and online weekly sets.
Format shift
Online CIS101 stacks many projects and quizzes; in-person CIS201 stresses projects without enough walkthrough.
Teaching experience
Poor
30/100
Students repeatedly cite book-reading lectures, hard-to-understand delivery, impatience, and little real help.
Format shift
Online quality is mixed; in-person complaints about rudeness and useless lectures are stronger.
Assessment method
FocusOnAssignments
42/100
Projects, quizzes, discussions, and weekly work drive grades more than classic high-stakes exams in most comments.
Format shift
Online CIS101 is project and quiz heavy; x x x x x x x x x literacy.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
In-person sections, especially CIS201, are widely panned for x x x x x, and unhelpful or harsh demeanor.
Main concern
Lectures add little value and x x x x x x x x.
What students said
“Stay away!”
“Probably the x x x x. She will give you an F on an assignment but x x x x x x.”
“all she does is read the book word for word as her lecture.”
Remote format
Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro
Online CIS101 is manageable with x x x, and resubmits, but instructions can still confuse and help is limited.
Main concern
x x and little hand-holding if you fall behind.
What students said
“As long as you turn everything on time it's an easy A.”
“The x x x x and will easily confuse the smartest people.”
Exam style
Intro literacy sometimes used open-book untimed tests; programming x x x x x and x x x x x.
Assessment risk
Standard
55/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
Some older CIS101 notes mention open-book untimed online tests; later CIS comments x x x x x x x x x.
“Easy A for Computer Literacy. x x x and open book.”
“on tests-OUCH! The class average for the midterm and x x x x.”
Online work centers on weekly quizzes, projects, discussions, and a x x; resubmits exist but x x x x.
“There are 11 projects, 11 discussions, and about 11 quizzes including the midterm. x x x x x x x x pasted assignments.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“Probably the x x x x. She will give you an F on an assignment but x x x x x x.”
“all she does is read the book word for word as her lecture. Pointless.”
“Stay away!”
“She will give you an F on an assignment but x x x x x x.”
“As long as you turn everything on time it's an easy A.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
35
Recent reviews read by the AI
35
Lifetime ratings
82/100
Evidence confidence
35 reviews span many years with consistent themes of weak lectures and x x, though course mix and age dilute a few outliers.
Inside 35 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
7 reported outcomes
A 1 · A- 1
B+ 1 · B 1
C 1
No reported values
No reported values
Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1