AI Rate Professor

English

Patricia Wagner

ENGL210 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if personality and teaching climate matter; only consider if you can tolerate rudeness for a possible A.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAwful and RudeLots of HomeworkLecture HeavyHeavy ReadingWould Not Retake
  • Single review calls her awful and rude with constant struggle all semester.
  • , and lecture-heavy English workload.
  • Student still earned an A but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The student earned an A but describes constant struggle and , so the A still cost real work.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Difficulty rated 4 with lots of , and lecture load.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

and describes the experience as awful.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

An A was awarded, but the student still felt the overall experience was miserable.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Tags and comments emphasize lots of homework and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

14/100

Direct description of rude behavior and semester-long struggle with almost nothing liked.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Lecture-heavy class with and a notable end-of-semester project.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Harsh interpersonal experience in English with and .

Main concern

Rude teaching style and semester-long struggle outweigh the .

What students said

“She was awful and rude. Struggled with her throughout the semester.”
ENGL210

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; main assessments mentioned are homework and a .

Lecture heavyEnd-of-semester project

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; end project was the only liked assessment piece.

End-of-semester projectLecture heavy
“The end of the , but other than that there wasn't much I liked about the class.”
ENGL210

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was awful and rude. Struggled with her throughout the semester.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting interpersonal conflict and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

14/100

“She was awful and rude. Struggled with her throughout the semester.”

📚 Workload

22/100

“Lots of homework”

👎 Recommendation Rate

10/100

“other than that there wasn't much I liked about the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was awful and rude.
  • Lecture heavy
  • Struggled with her throughout the semester.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • Get ready to read
  • The end of the , but other than that there wasn't much I liked about the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2019 review with strong negative tone; limited .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL2101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values