AI Rate Professor

Theater

Nancy Christian

TA111 · TA117 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

if you already know physics and engineering basics and truly want the material; .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHigh DifficultyExpects Prior Physics KnowledgePolarizing Teaching StyleMandatory AttendanceMixed Fun vs Frustration
  • Course content is very hard and physics/engineering heavy for theater tech
  • One recent fan found it hard but fun and
  • , and failure-prone

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Difficulty ratings are very high and older comments report mass failures despite effort.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Students say it piles on math, physics, and engineering far beyond beginner theater expectations.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory and participation matters.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

One enthusiastic review is outweighed by repeated claims of and high fail rates.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Comments about nearly everyone failing point to unforgiving outcomes for underprepared students.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

High difficulty, physics-heavy content, and participation pressure imply substantial work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

and promised help does not materialize.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews stress participation and overall hardness but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

one student loved a hard but fun class, while , and failure-heavy.

Main concern

Expects deep prior physics and engineering knowledge despite prereqs, and many students reportedly failed.

What students said

“It was hard, but . It was interesting and fun.”
TA117
“If you do not have prior knowledge in the fields of physics and .”
TA117
“all but two people in the class failed when i took it.”
TA117

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but content difficulty and failure reports make exams feel high-risk.

High Content Demands

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews ; risk comes from content difficulty.

High Content Demands
“all but two people in the class failed when i took it.”
TA117

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you do not have prior knowledge in the fields of physics and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews with mixed tones. Credibility rating: Medium.

🔥 Difficulty Warning

12/100

“i came into this class hoping to have fun, not do math and phsysics.”

🎯 Teaching Clarity

28/100

“the way she teaches only makes sense to her and no one else.”

👍 Minority Positive

70/100

“It was hard, but . It was interesting and fun.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • all but two people in the class failed when i took it.
  • If you do not have prior knowledge in the fields of physics and .
  • It was hard, but .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the way she teaches only makes sense to her and no one else.
  • meh, boring and textual. but class was fun.
  • She claims she'll help you but that's a damn lie.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews over several years show a consistent hard/mixed pattern, but sample is small and mostly old.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

TA1173 reviews
TA1111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values