AI Rate Professor

English

Sarah Forest

ENGLISH104 · ENG104 · ENGL45 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take her for English composition if , and a fair paper-heavy workload.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Assignment ExpectationsStrong Written FeedbackCritical Thinking FocusBalanced WorkloadPapers Over Exams
  • and and thinking
  • and
  • , but overall experience stays highly positive

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students report As and A-minuses on papers with moderate difficulty when directions are followed.

Most grade evidence is online; the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Difficulty ratings are low to moderate and workload is described as the perfect amount rather than brutal.

Online and in-person comments both describe manageable English composition work.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

; no strict attendance enforcement appears in comments.

Flexibility is clearest in online reviews; .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

, and credit her with improving critical thinking.

Strong recommendation tone appears in both online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students earn high paper grades with and .

Format shift

Online ; one mentions late-term lag.

Workload

Light

72/100

Four short papers, weekly discussions, and .

Format shift

; online reviews agree it is manageable.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

, and strong critical-thinking support define the experience.

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both emphasize clarity and helpfulness.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and discussion boards with only one test.

Format shift

In-person review is most explicit; online reviews also stress assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The and discussion load with one test and strong critical-thinking gains.

Main concern

, so patterns rest mostly on online evidence.

What students said

“No cons. . 4 papers, 3-4 pages long. .”
ENG104

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and feedback, noting lighter difficulty but occasional late-semester grading delays.

Main concern

term so .

What students said

“she takes the time to give you feedback on what you are doing right or wrong.”
ENGL45
“Very clear on and .”
ENG104
“Follow directions and do the work”
ENGLISH104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course relies on papers and low.

Only One TestPaper HeavyDiscussion BoardsPeer Reviews

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

short papers, weekly discussions, and peer reviews.

Only One Test4 PapersWeekly Discussion BoardsPeer Reviews
“ . 4 papers, 3-4 pages long. Discussion boards every week. .”
ENG104

Online

Online reviews do not detail proctoring or exam software; .

Assignment FocusedWritten FeedbackNo Exam Details Given
“Very clear on and .”
ENG104

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No cons. . 4 papers, 3-4 pages long. ... Made me a better critical thinker.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (3 online, 1 in , and balanced workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Very clear on and .”

📝 Workload Balance

72/100

“Not too much work but not too little, I'd say the perfect amount.”

💬

85/100

“she takes the time to give you feedback on what you are doing right or wrong.”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Online but she never felt distant

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Got A's and A-'
  • Follow directions and do the work
  • Not too much work but not too little

Theme 3

✍️ About Writing Growth

  • She helped me become a better critical thinker
  • Made me a better critical thinker

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Four fairly detailed reviews across 2014-2018 show consistent praise; online sample is small but aligned with the .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1042 reviews
ENGL451 review
ENGLISH1041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values