AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Jane Burnett

CHEM201 · CHEM202 · CHEM100 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid unless you can fully teach yourself chemistry and still want a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoesn't Explain WellTeach YourselfTough GraderTest HeavyLecture Mismatch
  • and , so students must self-teach.
  • Workload is heavy with online HW, labs, and .
  • and many warn to pick another chemistry instructor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

, and self-teaching load make an A rare without exceptional independent work.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

16/100

, and hard exams make the course feel extremely difficult.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Tags and comments and skipping means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Would-take-again is 0 percent and most reviews urge finding another chemistry professor.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; exams are hard and many report poor grades despite heavy effort.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Lots of , and constant studying are constant themes.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Most students say she rambles, reads PowerPoints, or .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Test-heavy and lecture-exam mismatch .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

yet poorly aligned to exams and homework; and students report teaching themselves from the book and YouTube.

Main concern

and , so struggling students fall behind fast.

What students said

“She is a nice professor but does not know how to effectively relay her knowledge.”
CHEM100
“Lecture doesnt relate to the exams and online hw which takes a while and the book does not help whatsoever.”
CHEM201
“You have to study and teach yourself.”
CHEM100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes and often include topics students say were not taught; a few report a small notecard on the final.

Test heavyMaterial not covered in lectureHard examsNotecard on final (sometimes)

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and frequently mismatched to lectures; limited evidence of a 3x5 notecard on some finals.

Test heavyUncovered material on exams3x5 notecard on final
“ .”
CHEM201
“Let us have 1 side of a 3x5 notecard for final.”
CHEM202

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She absolutely awful! She doesn't teach she rambles about subjects that are not in the book or .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching clarity and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Clarity

24/100

“ and speaks fast as if she forgets that she is teaching students.”

🧪 Self-Teaching Required

18/100

“You don't really learn anything by lecture, and watching youtube videos.”

📉 Recommendation

8/100

“If you struggle with .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • All she does is read from the powerpoint.
  • Does not like to answer any questions if .
  • Your completely on your own in her class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Don't come into this class expecting an easy A or even an Easy C.
  • I studied until 2am with my group and either got a C or a D on the exams.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is a nice professor but does not know how to effectively relay her knowledge.
  • Cheery lady and students like her.
  • Cares about all students and wants them all to succeed!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

14 fairly detailed recent reviews with strong negative consensus, though a few extreme positive outliers slightly lower reliability.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CHEM2017 reviews
CHEM1006 reviews
CHEM2021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B 2

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2