AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Susana Munoz

MATH120 · MATH105 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if and tolerate uneven lecture clarity.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLong LecturesMath Lab HomeworkBlurry Board ProjectionHelp Only If AskedMixed Clarity
  • One student earned an A with online notes and .
  • Another found lectures due to blurry tablet projection and limited help time.
  • Attendance and difficulty feel inconsistent across the two courses reviewed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible with Math Lab work, but another student left with Incomplete after high difficulty.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings and comments range from fairly easy to very hard depending on the course.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

and another says it was mandatory.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Mild interest in retaking mixes with and limited help.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

An A without heavy textbook use appears possible, but incomplete outcomes also appear.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

and can feel frustrating, with occasional unrelated .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Lectures can help when notes are posted, but projection quality and limited help time hurt learning.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

40/100

Math Lab homework and posted notes .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one manageable MATH120 path versus a frustrating MATH105 setup with hard-to-read projections.

Main concern

Lecture visuals can be blurry and help is limited unless you push for it.

What students said

“I didn't open the book once and still did pretty good in the class.”
MATH120
“ and hard to read especially when she uses bright pen colors.”
MATH105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's there if you need help, which you will, but you have to ask her for it, but she won't spend time.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews with mixed outcomes. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Her lectures are long and and it helped a lot.”

📉 Clarity Concerns

35/100

“ and hard to read especially when she uses bright pen colors.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

42/100

“ but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are long and and it helped a lot.
  • She uses a tablet to show solutions in class... .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I didn't open the book once and still did pretty good in the class.
  • as help but sometimes helped.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only two short 2016 in-person reviews with conflicting tone make the sample thin and low confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1051 review
MATH1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1