AI Rate Professor

English

Patrica Milhan

ENG102 · ENG50 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless you want a hard English class with heavy writing and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy workloadCynical toneUnclear expectationsHard to earn A
  • Students call her harsh and say she rarely gives As
  • Frequent heavy work with tight deadlines for essays
  • and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

One student says an A is possible only with extreme work; another says she does not give As and barely passed with a B.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty ratings are high and comments , and picky standards.

In-person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

; no evidence of flexible policy.

In-person only.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Both reviews are negative, with one explicitly saying do not pick her or you will be sorry.

In-person only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report she marks off for not doing things her way and does not give As.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Frequent work regardless of time constraints and not enough time for essays.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Described as cynical and horrible with and little helpful guidance.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Heavy emphasis on essays and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Both reviews describe a cynical, demanding English instructor with , and difficulty earning As.

Main concern

, and unclear expectations make the class high-stress.

What students said

“It's definitely possible to pass with an A, but you REALLY have to work for it.”
ENG102
“She is a horrible teacher. First off, she does not give A's.”
ENG50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays and .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; assessment centers on essays with picky standards and tight deadlines.

Essay-heavyUnclear expectations
“does not give you .”
ENG50

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do not Pick her or you will be sorry!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 and heavy workload. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Teaching Quality

25/100

“She is a horrible teacher.”

📝

18/100

“First off, she does not give A's.”

📚 Heavy Work

22/100

“She is cynical and will give work as frequently as possible regardless of time constraints.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Prof. Milhan is an... interesting teacher.
  • She is cynical
  • Never know what to expect

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you REALLY have to work for it
  • she does not give A's
  • I barley passed with a B.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Only two older reviews (2010-2015) with consistent negativity but very small sample.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1021 review
ENG501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values