AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Donovan Rinker-Morris

POLS113 · POLS211 · POLS114 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Skip POLS113 if you can; if you want a heavy critical-thinking grind and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing by courseLong unfocused lecturesLate or missing syllabusHard to transfer withApproachable when engaged
  • POLS113 is widely panned while POLS211 and POLS114 get warmer notes.
  • Common complaints are endless read-aloud lectures, late syllabus, and .
  • Getting a strong grade is tough, especially for students aiming to transfer.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students report C as common and even D grades, with transfer-minded reviewers saying a B is unlikely without heavy time and background.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Content and pacing feel dense, with long lectures and high difficulty ratings especially in POLS113.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most POLS113 voices urge students to stay away, outweighing a smaller set of positive POLS211 and POLS114 comments.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Comments describe tough outcomes for transfer students and weak clarity .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students warn the class needs lots of time, sleep sacrifice, and heavy lecture endurance.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

A minority praise approachability and critical thinking, but most describe boring read-aloud lectures with little direction.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews stress long lectures and unclear expectations more than a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person POLS classes feel lecture-heavy and often directionless, with a few strong notes on approachability and critical .

Main concern

Unfocused multi-hour lectures and a syllabus that may arrive mid-semester make grades and transfer plans risky.

What students said

“ .”
POLS113
“the syllabus came at the and unfocused”
POLS113
“He is very concerned about the success of his students and . ”
POLS211

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring style or open-book policy, so and poorly signaled.

Unclear exam formatLecture-heavy course

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, focusing instead on lecture style and grade risk.

Unclear expectationsLecture-heavy
“There were no discussions just long lectures that .”
POLS113
“it's very unlikely you will even get a B on this class. C is common.”
POLS113

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews, highlighting course polarization, lecture style, and grade risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Quality

36/100

“Just think about somebody read words to you for 3 hours.”

📉 Recommendation

30/100

“ .”

🎯 When He Works

70/100

“He is very approachable when you have questions and .”

📚 Structure Issues

25/100

“The only reason it's difficult is because there was no syllabus and no direction on the professor's expectations.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • somebody read words to you for 3 hours
  • long lectures that
  • He can be a little long winded at times

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • C is common
  • very unlikely you will even get a B
  • if you want to transfer

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and respectful of everyone's ideas
  • incredibly helpful
  • concerned about the success of his students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine detailed but older 2013-2014 reviews show a consistent POLS113 pattern with some course-level split, so confidence is moderate rather than high.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

POLS1136 reviews
POLS2112 reviews
POLS1141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values