AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Amy Borghia

PSYCH109 · PSYCH110 · PSYCH108 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you can handle writing-heavy discussion work in some courses.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful and NiceMixed DepthWriting Heavy SectionsHard Tests in Some CoursesAlways Late
  • Most students find her nice, helpful, and scores.
  • Some sections feel easy while Developmental Psych can be writing-heavy with .
  • Critiques include lateness and limited subject depth beyond the textbook.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Some classes feel not hard, but Dev Psych demands heavy writing and .

; one student described an online-style Dev Psych experience within an in-person-tagged review.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Average difficulty is low, yet one course is called demanding with and lots of writing.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

One course required discussion participation; other .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Multiple students call her amazing or and lateness notes.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

; courses range from easy .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Some classes seem light, but one section required lots of writing and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

, and delightful, with some criticism of depth and punctuality.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of textbook-based teaching, writing, discussions, and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person psych students mostly praise her as , and nice, though one notes lateness and limited depth and another describes a demanding writing-heavy section.

Main concern

Workload and test hardness vary by course; older sparse comments lower confidence.

What students said

“This professor is amazing.”
PSYCH108
“ . takes interest in the subject and students. and nice :)”
PSYCH108
“A LOT of writing and participating in . The ”
PSYCH110
“not a lot of knowledge from her. ”
PSYCH109

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

At least and heavy writing; other reviews do not detail proctoring.

Hard TestsWriting HeavyMandatory Discussions

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and mandatory discussion writing in Dev Psych.

Hard TestsWriting HeavyMandatory Discussions
“The , and hard to study for”
PSYCH110
“A LOT of writing and participating in ”
PSYCH110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was a delightful teacher and the class was made to learn the subject well. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting supportiveness, mixed workload, and recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“This professor is amazing.”

❤️ About Character

82/100

“ . takes interest in the subject and students. and nice :)”

📈 Workload Risk

45/100

“A LOT of writing and participating in . The ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor is amazing.
  • She was a delightful teacher

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • The , and hard to study for
  • A LOT of writing and participating in

Theme 3

⚠️ About Drawbacks

  • not a lot of knowledge from her

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews from 2010-2011 with consistent positive tone, but several are very short and grades are missing.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYCH1082 reviews
PSYCH1102 reviews
PSYCH1091 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values